THE END OF FREEDOM
The above was the bold headline in the Daily
Telegraph on 24th March 2020.
The Government is now in the process of passing an
Enabling Act, every bit as draconian as the one Hitler got passed after the
burning of the Reichstag. This is on the
back of the current scare over the Corona Virus pandemic and has been called by
the media the “Coronavirus Act”.
Behind all the new rights to make legislation for
Ministers, behind the new detention without trial and the end of freedom of
assembly and, indeed, the end of the role of Parliament itself, there is also
the creeping use of technological surveillance on “citizens”.
There was an article buried where most people would
not see it in the Business section of the Sunday Telegraph, which confirms the
direction of travel and below that is an article demonstrating what use the
Chinese Communist dictatorship has put this technology to use for so far
Does anyone think that, once the Government has got
such access, that it will ever be released?
Here is the article:-
BT ready to share data that tracks people’s movement
By Christopher Williams, SUNDAY TELEGRAPH BUSINESS EDITOR
22 March 2020 • 5:00am
The chief executive of BT, who is recovering from
coronavirus, has said the company stands ready to use its technology to help
track and manage the outbreak.
In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, Philip Jansen said BT
is working with officials on plans to share data to monitor population
movements and on a system of mass communications via smartphones.
He said: “If the Government feels it’s appropriate
in the next few weeks we can help understand the flow and dynamics of people as
the situation develops.” It is envisaged that mobile operators such as BT could
share such insights with officials on how mobile phone users are moving around
the country as the pandemic spreads.
The data could be used alongside the latest NHS
figures to help decide when and where to tighten or lift restrictions on travel
and businesses, for instance.
Mr Jansen, 53, said BT and other mobile operators
are also talking to officials about how they could help communicate public
health advice. He said: “We are looking at whether we can be a helpful
communication vehicle for our 30 million customers.
“There would be push notifications for all mobile
customers on all operators.”
The most advanced communications work involves
simple mass nationwide text messaging. However, a more advanced “cell
broadcast” system that would allow alerts to be targeted to coronavirus
hotspots is also under discussion.
Mr Jansen said the BT network is currently coping
well with increased demand from people working from home and
that he expects to return to the office on Monday.
Here is a link to the original article>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/03/22/bt-ready-share-data-tracks-peoples-movement/
Here is the earlier article on what the Chinese
Government has done:-
China unleashes its
surveillance technology to fight coronavirus
From facial recognition to
infrared cameras, authorities have deployed a range of technologies – but at
what cost?
By Michael Cogley, TECHNOLOGY CORRESPONDENT11 February 2020 • 11:29am
China is the hallmark of the
surveillance state – the living experiment of George Orwell’s Big Brother.
The watchful eye of the
Chinese government uses a range of technologies to monitor its citizens,
ranging from social media monitoring to CCTV cameras boasting facial
recognition and thermal tracking.
The cameras can be used to
spot people with low-grade fevers while its railway systems can provide a list
of people sitting nearby should a patient hop on board a train. Authorities are
using the technology to monitor the spread of the deadly virus.
Trading one’s privacy for a
safer country is a constant debate. If China can prove its monitoring methods
are a force for good in battling something like the
coronavirus then it could set the world on course
for more widespread adoption.
Facing up to failure
Facial recognition has been
deployed in numerous public locations across China, from train stations and
airports to hotels and city streets. While it is used in many cases to cull
criminal activity it is also vital to everyday life, such as entering gated
communities and paying for things.
The technology has hit
something of a snag however in its bid to monitor the spread of the virus:
surgical masks. The ubiquitous adoption of masks has proven to be a nuisance to
those trying to use FaceID to unlock their phones or pay but has also caused
Chinese authorities headaches when it comes to tracking its citizens that may
have been exposed to the virus.
“The practice of facial
surveillance has been enthusiastically embraced in China,” says Jessica
Helfand, author of ‘Face: A Visual Odyssey’.
“It is evident in everything
from scanners installed in public restrooms in Beijing to catch toilet paper
thieves, to a Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise in Hangzhou where you plug into
Alibaba’s “smile to pay,” online paywall, to a rise in supermarkets so certain
of their surveillant skills that they are increasingly free of clerical staff.”
In some cases faces can be
identified despite the obstruction, however much of the time the tech can prove
to be useless.
A study from the University
of Florence found that the removal of the upper half of the face led to a “more
significant” drop in recognition that the bottom half. However, coverage by an
item like a mask still led to significant levels of confusion in the software.
Similarly, Huawei’s
vice-president Bruce Lee said that the mask-wearing scenario was tested on the
company’s Mate 20 Pro.
“The eyes and head have too
few feature points to guarantee security,” he said in a post on Chinese social
media site Weibo.
“Eventually, the face
recognition unlocking in the scene with masks and scarves is abandoned. That’s
why we still keep fingerprints on our phones that support 3D face unlock.”
Other technologies
Facial recognition is far
from the only technology being deployed by the Chinese to fight the virus.
Should a patient suffering from the virus board a train, the railway network’s
“real name” system can provide a list of people sitting nearby.
Similarly mobile apps can
tell users if they’ve been on a flight or a train with a carrier. Maps can even
show the locations of buildings where infected patients live.
Surveillance camera firm
Zhejiang Dahua says it can detect fevers with infrared cameras to an accuracy
within 0.3ºC.
One such app, the “close contact detector”, tells citizens if they have been near
someone who has been confirmed or suspected of having the virus. It
was developed alongside the China Electronics Group Corporation and uses data
from the country’s health and transport authorities.
The state-run news agency
Xinhua reported that users can make an inquiry as to their current condition by
scanning a QR code on their phones.
Elsewhere Chinese telecoms
providers have quietly tracked the movement of their users. Text messages were
sent to Beijing residents this week telling them they could check where they
had been over the last 30 days as part of a service offered by China Mobile.
Reuters reported that it did not explain why users might need this but that it
could be useful if they’re questioned by police.
“In the era of big data and
internet, the flow of each person can be clearly seen. So we are different from
the SARS time now,” epidemiologist Li Lanjuan said in an interview with China’s
state broadcaster CCTV last week, comparing the outbreak to a virus that killed
800 people in 2003.
“With such new technologies,
we should make full use of them to find the source of infection and contain the
source of infection.”
Deadly killer
More than 43,000 people have
been affected by the disease and its spread has continued at a rapid pace. Four
more people in the UK have been tested positive for the virus, bringing the total number of infections in England to eight.
The total death toll of the
virus is at least 1,016, following the death of another 108 in China people
on Sunday.
The unsettling spread of the
virus has forced the Chinese government into drastic actions, including the
construction of a 1,000-bed facility in Wuhan, where the virus is believed to have originated from.
The ethical question
China’s use of mass surveillance has constantly drawn the ire of privacy advocates,
even in scenarios where it is being used to tackle the spread of a deadly
virus.
Director of Big Brother
Watch Silkie Carlo says the surveillance infrastructure was designed for
“population control” and that it could easily be “weaponised against its own
people”.
“Facial recognition cameras
are reportedly being used to log people's whereabouts and proximity to others,
for example on public transport, creating detailed searchable records of
exposure to people who might have the virus,” she said.
“China's mass surveillance
architecture could have especially sinister consequences in this crisis. This
tinderbox for turnkey tyranny should be a warning to every aspiring 'smart'
city and surveilled nation in the world, including our own.
Helfand says the
surveillance protocols employed by China are “vast” and that this level of
people-watching can isolate, label, and stigmatise.
“That a country seeks to
contain a viral epidemic is understandable,” she says.
“That cameras embed
themselves everywhere to catch us in public seems a different issue entirely,
and strikes me as more socially aggressive than clinically wise.”
Here is a link to the
original of the article>>>