The purpose of the creation of the 'Supreme Court' was to entrench Blairism into the Constitution

So now we have had the decision of the “Supreme Court” on Boris Johnson’s proroguing of Parliament.  In which, on very thin grounds, the Supreme Court has dismissed one of the key provisions in our Constitution.  

This is Article 9 in the Bill of Rights which says as follows (the significant bits of which I have underlined):-

“Bill of Rights1688 CHAPTER 2 1 William and Mary Session 2:-

".....That the Freedome of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament...."

To understand why the “Supreme Court” has ruled in this way it is necessary to consider its purpose. 

The purpose behind the creation of both the Judicial Appointments Commission & Supreme Court was to entrench Blairism into the UK’s Constitution.

The members of the Supreme Court are of course also appointed by the Judicial Appointments Commission which was specifically and openly set up by Tony Blair and his friend Lord Irvine, his Lord Chancellor, to, as Lord Irvine, put it to “ensure that nobody with Reactionary Views can be appointed or promoted” as a Judge. 

In order to achieve this, the Judicial Appointments Commission has made it clear that, in order to get appointed or promoted as a Judge, you must “demonstrate a life time’s commitment to Equality and Diversity”.  This of course means that every appointment is likely to be of a Left-wing, Multiculturalist, Internationalist, Europhile.

It was as part of this drive that the now Lord Justice Hickinbottom when he was the “Judicial Lead for Diversity” gleefully told the solicitors Law Society Gazette that he suggested “Creating a judicial career fast-track (to) help improve diversity on the bench”

Ever since 2004 the Judicial Appointments Commission has continued to appoint and to promote wherever possible only those who are multi-culturalist activists.

The effect of this can easily be seen if you look at the backgrounds of the eleven Supreme Court “Justices”, as reported in The Slog, as follows:-

“Lady Brenda Hale (Chair) is a lifetime academic and former Law Professor who went straight into being a Judge with no history in commercial law at all. She is a feminist, a great believer in diversity, and a lifelong liberal. I would be amazed if she voted any other way than Remain.

Lord Robert Reed (Deputy) is a Scot who also sits on the EU’s European Court of Human Rights. He was an expert advisor to the EU/Council of Europe Joint Initiative with Turkey. No prizes for guessing where Rabbie’s sympathies lie.

Lord Brian Kerr is the former Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, and the first Catholic ever appointed to that post. In 2014, he had this to say in a lengthy interview:

“The Law has changed enormously since the enactment of the Human Rights Act. The central point about the Act is that it has given judges free access to the rich vein of jurisprudence that is provided by the Strasbourg Court…..we now have the ability to draw on jurisprudence from all over the Council of Europe on matters that critically affect the balance of power between the citizen and the state and I think that that can only be a good thing.”

Draw your own conclusions.

Lord Nicholas Wilson is left of centre and on the record as saying, ““In pursuit of its economic policy, the UK government has recently felt the need to dismantle much of our welfare state, namely social security and the National Health Service.” He is a passionate supporter of the ECHR in Strasbourg. The activist site Divorce & the City is currently preparing to impeach Lord Wilson for alleged corruption and ‘pro State’ bias. He is, reputedly, not a fan of Boris Johnson or Brexit.

Lord Robert Carnwath is an unknown quantity who appears never to have expressed an opinion about anything, except he sits on the advisory council of the English School in Poland.

Lord Patrick Hodge is another Scot. He was a civil servant in the 1970s, and then Counsel to the Department of Energy from 1989 to 1991, and to the Inland Revenue from 1991 to 1996. Ergo, chummy with the unelected State, 99.99% of whom are anti-Brexit. I’d imagine he’s also a wow at parties.

Lady Jill Black is unique in the Supreme Court in not having been to Oxbridge. You can see from this just how inclusive the Court is, and thus totally in touch with the average person.

Lord David Lloyd-Jones is another scholar who wound up a judge. He was a Fellow of Downing College, Cambridge from 1975 to 1991. From 1999 to 2005, he was a visiting professor at City University, London, and was then put onto The Bench. He has always specialised in international  and EU law. Only two months ago, in a Supreme Court hearing involving Kuoni Travel, Lloyd-Jones ruled that EU Law had primacy in the case. He gave the judgement in Welsh, which was a first. Highly unlikely to have voted to leave a Union in whose law he specialises, one could reasonably argue.

Lady Mary Arden became a member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2011, and sits as a judge of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg blah blah yawn etc. In 2015 she published a book about the impact of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg on the domestic law of the UK. In his preface to the book, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales noted:

Not a Leaver then, we suspect. This is all getting terribly predictable, isn’t it?

Lord David Kitchin coxed the team that won the 1975 Boat Race for Cambridge. More pertinently, he has for many years been a strong advocate of more harmonisation of the Law between EU jurisdictions. In May this year, he gave an interview offering the following opinion in relation to patent law, in which he is a specialist:

“The situation is improving and that is because there is now much more discussion and communication between judges in different countries. Judges now meet regularly to discuss these and other difficult issues. We consider each other’s judgments; all of us attach importance to the decisions of the Technical Boards of Appeal and the Enlarged Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Convention….there might not be jurisdiction to make references to the EU Court of Justice in these cases, or any cases after Brexit.”

And so this would be a bad thing, wouldn’t i? Get real: Lord Kitchin is a Good European who lectures about legal alignment in the EU.

Lord Philip Sales really is a case of leaving the best until last. Sales has had something of a meteoric rise: he is the youngest of the Supreme Court judges, and was a practising barrister at 11 King’s Bench Walk – according to The Guardian ‘a network of old boys and cronies’ that enabled him to be appointed First Counsel at the Treasury…a department of State with a long and grubby history of undying support for the EU. The recommendation that he be appointed came from Lord Irvine and Tony Blair’s old chambers.

Philip Sales is New Labour through and through. In 2016, he was a member of the Court of Appeal which ruled that 130,000 Labour members who joined the party after 12 January 2016 would not be able to vote in the leadership contest. This overruled the previous High Court decision to allow the 130,000 disenfranchised Labour Party members to vote in the 2016 Labour Party leadership election. In short, it was a bid by the Blairites to keep Corbyn out.

Finally, he was one of the three judges forming the High Court in proceedings concerning the use of the royal prerogative for the issue of notification in accordance with Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. His role in this judgment meant that he appeared in an infamous front-cover of the Daily Mail  – Enemies of the People – as a solid-gold Remainer.”

(The original of this useful article can be found here >>> https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2019/09/25/exclusive-why-this-supreme-court-was-never-going-to-find-bojos-proroguation-legal/ )

It is also being said that many of the 11 “Justices” are in receipt of salaries from the EU.  If true then this is a very serious scandal!

I have noticed that Jacob Rees-Mogg and other Conservatives are grumbling about the decision of the Supreme Court, but they have only their own Party to blame! 

It's no use Conservative MPs now complaining about the same europhile multiculturalists whom their Party had appointed to the Supreme Court making Europhile Multiculturalist decisions.

The Conservatives have had nearly 10 years in power to change the Judicial Appointments system but they have chosen not to do so!

My speech to the English Democrats’ Conference on 21st September 2019

My speech to the English Democrats’ Conference on 21st September 2019

This is an extract from my speech to the English Democrats’ Conference on 21^st September 2019:-

Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to our conference in Leicester. 

Let me tell you part of the story of Leicester which is part of the story of England.

Leicester is now in the geographical heart of England but once it was not.  Once it was one of the five boroughs from which the pagan Viking invaders ruled this part of what is now England. 

Leicester had been part of the English Kingdom of Mercia but in 918 AD it was at the forefront of the English fightback when it fell to Æthelflæd, the famous “Lady of the Mercians”, who was the daughter of Alfred the Great and the Aunt of Athelstan, the grandson of Alfred who was to go on to unite England on the 12^th July 927 AD.

So here we are, Ladies and Gentlemen, in Leicester at the start of another English fightback!

In July many of us were in Malmsbury, where King Athelstan is buried, to support an initiative aiming to get the anniversary of United England’s birth fully celebrated before we reach United England’s eleven hundredth birthday on the 12^th July 2027!

As English Nationalists we should remember and treasure our Nation’s long and unique history and remember that the fightback that created a United England was a long and bloody fight against a fierce and dangerous Viking enemy who were afterwards absorbed into and became part of our modern English Nation.

Let me tell you a story.  Once upon a time there was a land in which we thought that the BBC and the newspapers mainly told us the truth but they were perhaps a bit inefficient and they got things wrong or missed out important information by mistake.  We thought that our politicians were basically on our side but were a bit out of touch, but if we communicated with them better, then good old “they” would sort it all out and then everything would be tickety-boo in the garden!

Ladies and Gentlemen I say to you that is no longer this land!  That is a land of lost contentment!

In this new land we all now know that most of the media lie to us – they are barefaced and shameless liars and deceivers with their own globalist, multiculturalist agenda in which they hope that all those who disagree with them will die out!

Now we know that many of our British Establishment politicians are not just a slightly eccentric Lib/Lab/Con.  No!  They are out and out enemies of all our traditions and enemies of our very nation.

This is a political elite that is so opposed to our Nation’s basic values that a so-called “Conservative” education Minister recently made it a crime for parents to stop their 6 year old children from having compulsory sex education lessons on “transgenderism”. 

This is a political elite which has been exposed as mostly made up of people who lied about their politics in order to get elected and then they pursued their own ideological agenda whilst sneering at the poor fools who were duped into electing them!

And its not only the media and the politicians who have been unmasked by Brexit as contemptuous of our peoples’ views and of our democratic votes but also the courts and Big Business and Big Trade Unions!

Ladies and Gentlemen what does this all add up to? 

Well I say, on the upside, that there will never be such an opportunity again for our politics to be fundamentally changed for the better.  Our peoples’ anger is ready to boil over!  And I say - rightly so!

We have been misled, we have been lied to and we have all been duped for far too long! 

Let’s work together to begin the English fightback and let’s together get our country back!

Ladies & Gentlemen

As Henry VIII could have said to each of his wives – I won’t keep you long - but don’t worry! I won’t keep you nearly as long as any of them were kept!

Thank you Stephen for all your hard work in setting up our conference and for all your work as our Secretary. 

We are a volunteer organisation and we depend upon our NC members.  Ladies and gentlemen please thank them.  Especially please thank our retiring Treasurer, Charles Vickers, for all his many years of work for our Party!

In July many of us were in Malmsbury, where King Athelstan is buried, to support an initiative of our colleague, Derek Hilling, who is aiming to get the anniversary of United England’s birth fully celebrated before we reach United England’s eleven hundredth birthday on the 12^th July 2027!

As English Nationalists we should remember and treasure our Nation’s long and unique history and remember that the fightback that created a United England was a long and bloody fight against a fierce and dangerous Viking enemy who were afterwards absorbed into and became part of our modern English Nation.

English Democrats

A Retrospective

We have been busy over the last year improving our operating systems.  We now have a highly successful website with over 62,000 signed up supporters.  We are also now growing by about 120 new members per month.

A prospective

General Election – stance depends

Local elections

Mayoral elections

Police Commissioner elections

U.S.P. after Brexit/English Independence – the only way out of May’s “Withdrawal Deal” or abject surrender capitulation.

English Voice

Important to keep in touch with members– please help with articles.

Future Conference Venues

Our new philosophy -

14^th March 2010 - Shrewsbury

We need to fight for England on various levels and using various tactics and strategies.

The Workers of Engalnd Union, CEP, COE, English Lobby

Lawfare

Von Clauswitz wrote that “war is politics carried on by other means”. 

President Trump’s chief campaign advisor, Steve Bannon, says that in modern times we should re-order that saying:-  “Politics is war carried on by other means”.

If you do that it makes us focus on the need to marshall all resources and to deploy them towards the grand strategic objective of victory.

Lawfare or the use of the law and of law cases to take the fight to the enemy is a useful tool in this arsenal.

Jarvis – later

“Defend Brexit Case” – later

Facebook – update

Pathfinding

_________________________________________________________

BORIS – WHAT IS HE UP TO? 

IS BORIS SERIOUSLY FOCUSED ON DELIVERING BREXIT?

For those of us that want to see Brexit delivered and, in particular, are hopeful of a ‘No Deal’ Brexit, Boris Johnson has made various remarks that his friend and campaign advisor, Sir Lynton Crosby would call ‘Dog Whistles’, that is remarks which call us back to heel like well-trained dogs! 

Of course these remarks might be genuine expressions of Boris’ personal determination and ideological commitment to Brexit “Do or die!” 

Alternatively these remarks might well be being said by Boris Johnson purely for reasons of expediency.  It would therefore be worth reminding ourselves of Boris’ history.

The first thing I should say is that I do personally like Boris’ style.  He is clearly an absolute star and a magnetic personality and performer with tremendous charisma.  He has genuine leadership ability which makes a fantastic change from the dispiriting lack of it of Theresa May and her inner circle.  That said let’s consider his position.

Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson was born in the United States and when he attended Oxford University his former tutor at Balliol confirmed that he did so as an American citizen.

More recently as MP for Henley and Editor of the Spectator and then as Mayor of London, Boris had seemed enthusiastically Europhile. 

I remember in a TV programme which he did enthusing on the topic that the EU was the new Roman Empire.  He suggested that what we now needed was a new Caesar Augustus! 

He also at one stage enthusiastically endorsed the idea of Turkey, the land of his Great Grandfather, Ali Kamal (one of the last Sultan’s ministers), joining the EU. 

We then have the occasion when he decided to come out as supporting Leave once David Cameron had called the EU referendum in 2016.  During that campaign he made all sorts of remarks which pleased us Leave supporters. 

However it should be borne in mind that he had done two draft speeches.  One supporting Remain and David Cameron, the other coming out for Leave.  David Cameron has also apparently confirmed that he thought Boris did not believe in Brexit.

I would therefore say it is not clear that Boris coming out for Leave was about commitment and principle, rather than about career and opportunity.

There is also Boris’ family background which is very Europhile, globalist, multi-racial, multi-cultural and metropolitan elitist.  Perhaps not the typical seed bed of patriotism and nationalism!

Now we turn to what is going on at the moment.  Boris has obviously got the leadership of the Conservative Party, partly on the basis of his personality but also partly on the basis of promising to deliver Brexit “Do or die”.  Brexit has therefore been very useful to his career ambitions.

When Boris became Prime Minister, Stephen Barclay became the New Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union.  The two of them still could have agreed by Consent that our case “Defend Brexit” would win and agreed that there be a Declaration that we were out on the 29^th. 

Indeed, we could have agreed some other date where we would be out if the Government thought there was any reason for having a different date. 

Instead of doing this, despite the fact that Boris, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Stephen Barclay and many Conservative MPs had been lobbied about it, the Government’s lawyers wrote to me and to the Court of Appeal saying that they had received instructions to reiterate the Government’s pleaded Defence.  Although I have asked for confirmation of who ordered it but I think it highly unlikely that that would have been written if the new Prime Minister and Secretary of State had not ordered it. 

A lot of the noise and froth which we read in the media or hear from Boris’ supporters is that he is being almost martyred for the issue of Brexit by the parliamentary Remainers, it is nevertheless worth pausing and considering that Boris had several opportunities to prevent the then Bill becoming law.  The Conservative Peers had lined up many amendments which would have filibustered the Bill so that it could not pass through the House of Lords before Parliament was prorogued and would therefore have been lost.  It has been reported that Boris personally stood the Conservative Peers down and enabled the Bill to pass without objection. 

He also could have refused or delayed Royal Assent to the Bill. There would then have been a further row about whether that was proper to do, but the time would have ticked away and we would have been closer to achieving Brexit with ‘No Deal’. 

He has now signalled that he would consider a ‘No Deal’ Brexit to be a failure. It is also  worth remembering that on the third occasion he did actually vote for Theresa May’s Withdrawal Deal, which, of course, is really more of an abject and almost unconditional surrender document.  From this we can draw the certain conclusion that Boris is not ideologically committed to opposing Theresa May’s deal.  The question of the deal is purely a matter of expediency for him.

We will see over the coming weeks whether he does take any decisions which advance the chances of a ‘No Deal’ Brexit, or whether he in fact prevents that from happening behind a cloak of ‘Dog Whistle’ remarks to Leavers. 

So you might ask me what I think Boris is actually trying to achieve if it is not a clean break Brexit? 

My answer would be that I think what he is trying to achieve is a General Election with him having a good chance of using the Brexit issue to enable him to destroy the Brexit Party and to get a large majority as a result of the election. 

If that election takes place before the 31^st October I wouldn’t then be at all surprised if Boris quickly signs us up to what to all intent and purposes is Theresa May’s deal. 

The amusing commentator Rod Liddall suggested that what Boris would sign us up to was “Theresa May’s pig of a deal which Boris had put lipstick and rouge on”!

What do you think?  Ladies and Gentlement will he stitch us up?

Conservatives

After Brexit

No deal

BRINO

No Brexit

Labour

Heartlands and traditional patriotic Labour supporters, Multiculturalist, Internationalist - v – Metropolism

Lib Dems

Revoke Article 50

Prosecute?

UKIP

Richard Braine

Conference

Brexit Party

Private Company – See docs.

Policy incoherence

Claire Fox – v – Ann Widdecomb

After Brexit?

The Brexit Vote

What has it done for us?

Let me tell you a story.  Once upon a time there was a land in which we thought that the BBC and the newspapers mainly told us the truth but they were perhaps a bit inefficient and they got things wrong or missed out important information by mistake.  We thought that our politicians were basically on our side but were a bit out of touch, but if we communicated with them better, then good old “they” would sort it all out and then everything would be tickety-boo in the garden!

Ladies and Gentlemen I say to you that is no longer this land!  That is a land of lost contentment!

In this new land we all now know that most of the media lie to us – they are barefaced and shameless liars and deceivers with their own globalist, multiculturalist agenda in which they hope that all those who disagree with them will die out!

Now we know that many of our British Establishment politicians are not just a slightly eccentric Lib/Lab/Con.  No!  They are out and out enemies of all our traditions and enemies of our very nation.

This is a political elite that is so opposed to our Nation’s basic values that a so-called “Conservative” education Minister recently made it a crime for parents to stop their 6 year old children from having compulsory sex education lessons on “transgenderism”. 

This is a political elite which has been exposed as mostly made up of people who lied about their politics in order to get elected and then they pursued their own ideological agenda whilst sneering at the poor fools who were duped into electing them!

And its not only the media and the politicians who have been unmasked by Brexit as contemptuous of our peoples’ views and of our democratic votes but also the courts and Big Business and Big Trade Unions!

Ladies and Gentlemen what does this all add up to? 

Well I say, on the upside, that there will never be such an opportunity again for our politics to be fundamentally changed for the better.  Our peoples’ anger is ready to boil over!  And I say - rightly so!

We have been misled, we have been lied to and we have all been duped for far too long! 

Let’s work together to begin the English fightback and let’s together get our country back!