Total Visits

Thursday 26 February 2015

Independent Press Standards Organisation and the Rotherham Advert


Following my correspondence with the Rotherham Advertiser I thought that I ought to see if the new Independent Press Standards Organisation would be any improvement on the Press Complaints Commission. Here is the correspondence. What do you think?


Letter dated 5.2.15

Sir Alan Moses

Independent Press Standards Organisation

Halton House
20/23 Holborn
London EC1N 2JD



Dear Sir

Re: Complaint against Rotherham Advertiser – Bias racial prejudice and inaccuracy




I recently tried to place an advertisement with the Rotherham Advertiser. There was then email correspondence from which it became clear that the “Editor” had an inappropriate attitude towards any matter arising out of the Jay Report. I would remind you that this is the report which was highly critical of Rotherham Council and the South Yorkshire Police. It also detailed extremely serious allegations of child gang rape and prostitution against by various Muslim/Pakistani gangs in Rotherham. Crimes in which the authorities had not only failed to properly investigate but had been complicit in at the very least the sense of covering up what was going on. Moreover instead of doing their duty they had persecuted anyone who tried to raise the subject.



I enclose the email correspondence and an article from the Daily Telegraph which I think is appropriate to consider and also refer to the recent Casey report on Rotherham.



I suspect that such a wide-ranging criminal conspiracy could not have been conducted without local journalists being aware of it. It would appear from the correspondence that the Editor of the Rotherham Advertiser is not only unwilling to mention the religion or ethnicity of the perpetrators, but even the likely culpability of Rotherham Council and South Yorkshire Police. In the circumstances I wish to make a complaint of bias and racial prejudice against the Rotherham Advertiser.



Yours faithfully





R C W Tilbrook



Enc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: mel.huggett
To: robintilbrook
Sent: 11/02/2015 10:18:03 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Independent Press Standards Organisation - Our reference 00654-15



Dear Mr Tilbrook



Thank you for contacting the Independent Press Standards Organisation.



Your complaint is currently being assessed, and we will be in touch with you again shortly. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions.



Should IPSO decide that your complaint falls outside of our remit, or does not raise a possible breach of the Code, we will write to you to explain why and send a copy of our letter to the publication.



Alternatively, if we decide that the concerns you have raised fall within our remit and raise a possible breach of the Code, and you have not previously exhausted the publication’s internal complaints procedures, a copy of your complaint and any other correspondence you have sent to us, including contact information, will be sent to the publication to provide it with the opportunity to resolve the matter directly with you.



A copy of the Editors’ Code of Practice, which is administered by IPSO, can be found at https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html.



Please note, in addition, the following information about our confidentiality and data protection procedures:



Confidentiality: The system of self-regulation requires good faith on both sides. In order for us to be able to investigate complaints effectively, it is essential that neither party to a complaint, complainant or newspaper/magazine, publishes information which has been provided as part of the investigation - most notably correspondence – without the consent of the other party. Publication, without consent, may affect our ability to continue to deal with a complaint or may be considered when we reach a decision as to whether the Code has been breached. Material provided by both complainants and publications during an investigation must only be used for the purpose of the complaint to us. This will not generally prohibit a publication from publishing details of any ruling.



Data protection: By pursuing the complaint, you consent to the processing of any personal data which may be provided for the purposes of dealing with your complaint. You also consent to the publication of any decision in relation to the complaint, but may withdraw consent in writing.



Further information about complaining to IPSO, including a summary of the complaints procedure, can be found at: https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/makeacomplaint.html.



With best wishes,





Mel Huggett (Mrs)

Receptionist / Complaints Assistant

Independent Press Standards Organisation

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: mel.huggett
To: robintilbrook
Sent: 11/02/2015 16:58:12 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Independent Press Standards Organisation - Our reference 00654-15



Dear Mr Tilbrook,

I write further to our earlier email.

You have contacted the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), the new independent regulator for the newspaper and magazine industry in the UK. We uphold the highest standards of journalism by monitoring and maintaining the requirements set out in the Editors’ Code of Practice, and provide support and redress for individuals seeking to complain about breaches of the Code.

It appears that the concerns you have raised do not relate to the editorial content of a newspaper or magazine, and it does not therefore appear that we will be able to assist you further.

If you do wish to make a complaint about editorial content, we would be grateful if you could provide a copy of any article about which you wish to complain, and explain how you consider the Editors’ Code of Practice has been breached (https://www.ipso.co.uk/IPSO/cop.html).

If we do not hear from you in seven days, we will assume you do not want to pursue a complaint through IPSO.

With best wishes





Mel Huggett (Mrs)

Receptionist / Complaints Assistant

Independent Press Standards Organisation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







From: RobinTilbrook
To: mel.huggett
Sent: 12/02/2015 15:37:56 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Independent Press Standards Organisation - Our reference 00654-15



Dear Mrs Huggett

Thank you for your email of the 11th.

It is concerning that the Independent Press Standards Organisation does not think that the vetting of advertisement content by the Editor is “editorial content”. Clearly the Editor has decided on the content of my advertisement and by any normal attribution of those words an Editor having a role in the decision as to content is encompassed by complaints relating to editorial content. I would like to see any legal opinion you may have to the contrary.

Yours sincerely



R C W Tilbrook



---------------------------------------------------------------------------









From: mel.huggett
To: robintilbrook
Sent: 17/02/2015 15:35:18 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Independent Press Standards Organisation - Our reference 00654-15



Dear Mr Tilbrook



Thank you for your email.



Disagreements about the text of advertisements do not amount to concerns about editorial content; therefore your concerns fall outside IPSO's remit, and I am afraid that we will be unable to assist you further.



IPSO's Regulations, which define its remit, are available in full on our website, at the following link: https://www.ipso.co.uk/assets/1/REGULATIONS__PDF_.PDF



Best wishes





Mel Huggett (Mrs)

Receptionist / Complaints Assistant

Independent Press Standards Organisation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------





From: RobinTilbrook
To: mel.huggett
Sent: 18/02/2015 09:41:40 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Independent Press Standards Organisation - Our reference 00654-15



So Newspapers are allowed to discriminate about adverts and that is Okay with your organisation?







-------------------------------------------------------------------------------





From: simon.yip
To: robintilbrook
Sent: 19/02/2015 12:03:39 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Independent Press Standards Organisation - Our reference 00654-15



Dear Mr Tilbrook,



Thank you for your email to my colleague, Mel Huggett.



As we previously explained, advertisements do not fall within IPSO's remit.



Best wishes





Simon Yip

Complaints Coordinator


-------------------------------------------------------------------

From: RobinTilbrook
To: simon.yip
Sent: 24/02/2015 09:22:37 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Independent Press Standards Organisation - Our reference 00654-15





Dear Mr Yip

Thank you for your email.

Please note that the Editor’s approach to my advert is, I believe, part of and indicative of his whole discriminatory approach to the reporting of the extremely serious child rape crimes that were going on in Rotherham and about which the whole local establishment closed ranks and refused to report or even acknowledge. That is the reason that I think that you should consider this an editorial matter.

I respectfully suggest that this is also something of a test case for the credibility of your organisation.

Yours sincerely



R C W Tilbrook

6 comments:

  1. Robin

    This is clear evidence of both direct and indirectrace discrimination again against the native English and other Britons. Had the reverse been true they would have taken you up.This is their weak point and we need to ecploit it. Why not take the matter up with the Equality and Human Rights Commission?

    However you should also sue them under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 for their lack of skill and care in dealing with the matter.

    The entire anti English project requires legal action unfortunately the muslims and communists have developed an effective misdirection tactic which gets them off the hook again and again. Even Prof Jay fell for it thats why she she refused to state that the grooming was motivated by racial hatred. She is an expert in child sex abuse not racial discrimination. She missed a sitter but her report can still be used to substantiate race discrimination claims that favour us for a change

    Francis

    ReplyDelete
  2. Robin, I would suggest that you read the excellent comment by Francis in response to an earlier blog when a blogger stated that Europeans were getting their just deserts with mass immigration. As Francis says, our fate was sealed by the arrival of the bankers in the age of Crowell and the creation of the City of London. They then went on to use us as cannon fodder to create their financial British empire. With the end of colonial empires they decided that we are in the way of their total world domination and so are using mass immigration into European countries and the destruction of the homogeneous nations of Europe in order to make the whole world like the EU. Smart thinking Europeans are in the way of their achieving their aims and we have to go.

    All is becoming plain with what Mr Banker Cameron is up to in the Ukraine. I learnt with horror that Poroshenko is getting our arms via the United Arab Emirates. Make no mistake, these are our arms and the British/Banker establishment is behind it. Cameron does not want peace, like his fellow psychopaths Poroshenko and Kerry, he is planning genocide in the East, as Putin has just said.

    Then the next stop will be Russia and China. Fortunately, we have a parliament with people in it who are not so stupid and brainwashed as the American congress who are against his sending our advisors to Kiev without a parliamentary mandate. I see that Kerry has now admitted that Washington has already sent both weapons and troops there.

    And suddenly I realised that they are up to the same trick with regard to the Islamic State whilst pretending to fight them and getting the ensuing terrorist surge to destroy Europe and Europeans as well. The arms that are reaching the IS from the Gulf States are our arms in all but name.

    Cameron is now like Charles the First, an absolute monarch acting without parliament. He was defeated over Syria and so has found a way round it via the Gulf States. We need another revolution world wide to defeat the bankers of Amsterdam. And their puppets Cameron and Blair need bringing to justice.

    Of course the removal of all the strong arab leaders and the total chaos are benefiting Zionism. And now Russia is being attacked in two directions; from the west and from the south as they plan the end of Syria and then Iran, Russia and finally China. It is all so monstrous. They are planning on total destruction of Europeans and others for their own ends. They are oblivious to the death toll and the consequences.
    They must be stopped.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Another point, I was confused as to why the UAE are funding Blair's latest money making role as an advisor to Serbia over EU membership.
    The UAE seem to have the cash to help us with. Serbia is, of course, another Russian ally so you have to wonder what Blair is up to.
    Austria has passed a law banning the outside funding of religious institutions i.e. mosques. The funding comes from Turkey and Saudi Arabia amongst others. We know that the building of mosques here is funded by Saudi Arabia. I wonder what fate is to befall Austria now?
    Perhaps Tony is stirring something up in Belgrade and we will be back to 1914. Have just read a book about Franz Ferdinand and Sophie and their assassination. The car they were travelling in had the number plate A 11 11 18. I can't believe they planned the armistice at the start so I assume it is just a strange coincidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fact that UAE and other gulf states are trying to get Serbia in the EU proves that the EU was designed to be muslim controlled colony from the start. I never disliked islam until I realised that it was all about total supremacy

      Francis

      Delete
  4. I suspect that a new report saying that the ever increasing immigration toll is in no way effecting housing and employment has been ordered by the government in order to counteract the UKIP effect and the facts produced by Immigration Watch. As for housing, if this is true then why have we so many, who appear to be the natives, sleeping on our streets? Perhaps people are being housed but this is causing the concreting over of the home counties through white flight and mounting opposition as evidenced by the placards appearing all over Oxfordshire for example.

    As for employment, our own are still being undercut by immigrants prepared to work for below the minimum wage as shown by the constant raids on Indian restaurants for employing illegal immigrant labour.

    But the report made no mention of the NHS and our schools - is that a surprise? - which are at crisis point. I can't speak for schools in our part of the world although the local primary is full to bursting but the major local hospital is in turmoil with people turning up for their operations only to be sent home not once but more than once because there is not a bed for them and others having their operations cancelled multiple times.
    As a gent interviewed on local television said, there are too many people in the country.

    The joke was Labour saying that Cameron's immigration policy was in tatters as they opened the floodgates in the name of diversification around the turn of the century. It is all just point scoring and they don't care about us at all. Cameron will not cut immigration as it benefits his friends, big business and big property developers and of course he and his banker friends want the English and all Europeans gone to create their one brown world. The last thing you can say is that you are proud of being a European; this is now tantamount to racism on the basis of "white supremacism" against all non-whites and you could probably be charged for it on the basis of stirring up racial and religious hatred.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes the Public Order Act 1986 as amended prevents from fighting back. But we English also have ethnic and national origins to so the failure of the cps police and authorities to act against ethnic minority racists is an act of racism in itself. The original 1965 Race Relations Act was designed to used by the indiginous Britons too, however the msm concealed this fact from us which in itself is more evidence of covert anti white racism.

      Francis

      Delete