Total Visits

Sunday 20 January 2013

Nick Lowles of the fancifully named "Hope not Hate" is lying yet again!

Nick Lowles of the fancifully named "Hope not Hate" is lying yet again!

Labourite Nick Lowles, of Labour's dirty tricks department, the laughably misnamed "Hope not Hate", is lying and smearing yet again. His 'article' is below and is of his usual poor and unprofessional journalistic standard.

It shouldn't surprise anyone that I regularly address many groups. I am an English patriot and nationalist and I will meet anyone in pursuit of developing the English Movement. I make no apologies for that. 

I don't believe a word of Nick Lowles' hysterical claims and I note that not a shred of evidence is produced by him to justify any of his silly claims.

I wonder if Nick Lowles would try to claim that because I addressed the Epping Forest District Green Party group that makes me a Green? But no, of course not - that wouldn't have any chance of smearing us with the politically correct brigade would it? 

I have now challenged Nick Lowles several times to come out from hiding behind his keyboard and face me in a fair debate about England's future.(such as here >>> http://robintilbrook.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/hope-not-hate-comes-out-as-labours.html and here >>> http://robintilbrook.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/hateful-and-hopeless-hope-not-hates.html).
  
Lowles has yet to dare to show his face. 

I am still waiting Nick!

Here is his 'article':-

The English Democrats are fair game

posted by: Nick Lowles | on: Tuesday, 15 January 2013, 05:31
HOPE not hate’s expose last night that English Democrat leader Robin Tillbrook attended a meeting of racists and Nazis over the weekend is final proof, if proof was needed, why his party is firmly in our sights. By attending a meeting with former and violent EDL supporters and the leaders of Britain First with the aim of establishing a new racist street movement, Tillbrook has pushed his party into the realms of Britain’s far right.
The English Democrats constantly try to refute any allegations of extremism and its supporters regularly bombard us with protests when we have written about them in the past. This is despite them doing a deal with Mark Cotterill and the England First Party for the 2009 European Elections. This is despite the fact that 43% of their candidates in last May’s local elections had until recently been in the British National Party.
But this recent development marks a new low for the English Democrats and one that we will be making sure voters know ahead of this May’s County Council elections.
In the meantime we are aware that a number of current or former English Democrat members are deeply unhappy with the party's new alliances with racists and nazis so we would welcome them to contact us. You can email me at nick@hopenothate.org.uk, confidentiality will be assured.
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/2433/the-english-democrats-are-fair-game

41 comments:

  1. Robin, you may choose not to publish this but I try very hard to get inside the mindset of this gentleman who seems to think that white countries (and only white countries as he would never dream of forcing it onto non-white countries) being a mosaic of different races and cultures or racial mixtures irrespective of overwhelming proof of differing iq levels and other qualities between the various races is something so necessary that he is in an almost hysterical panic at the thought of such a thing not happening.

    So he slaps down anybody who thinks it is not a desirable aim for mankind to transform hitherto stable and highly advanced white countries in this way as racists and nazis and to ensure that they are silenced and his lunatic plan can proceed unhindered. Perhaps it is now time for these people to accept that racism or racialism is a necessary evil to ensure that Europeans and the most advanced civilisation the world has ever known do not disappear with the resulting catastrophe for mankind. I have just heard that America has become more divided during Obama's first four years, not half as divided as it is going to be when whites there near minority status. I would like to be told of this man's iq. Mine is probably way past 100 and hence my total frustration when faced with this utterly infantile nonsense.

    I wish him well when he finds himself part of a white minority in a country that either resembles Brazil or the Indian sub-continent and I hope that he does not refuse to bow to Mecca when the inevitable day comes. The man is a total half-wit and has all the maturity of Jonathan Ross, which, as we know is zero.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I usually publish responses but that doesn't mean I agree with what is said. What you have said isn't our view.

      Delete
    2. Of course it cannot be your view, Robin. Even if it proves to be tragically correct and even if the clock is now ticking on European extinction.

      What puzzles me is that the Japanese refuse to allow mass immigration because they wish to preserve their racial purity and believe that, even with their growing number of old people to support, they can tackle the problem without relying on those third world countries which have a preponderance of young people, due to their high birthrates.

      Why isn't Mr Lowles targeting Japan, or China, or India or Black Africa who follow much the same line? Why isn't he calling the Japanese Nazis and protesting outside their embassy? Presumably because he is too terrified or getting a dose of his own medicine and being called a racist by them.

      Still, there is some good news. The Daily Mail informs us that the lead terrorist in Algeria was "Canadian". Apparently French Canada is now a favourist place of emigration for young men from France's former colonies in North Africa and Montreal is now a hotbed of islamic terrorism. There's one in the eye for French Canadian prime minister Pierre Trudeau who brought multiculturalism to Canada to weaken British Canadian domination. The French Canadians are now hoist by their own petard. But doubtless Quebec is much more vibrant as a consequence.

      Delete
    3. Multi-culturalisn is a red herring, merely camouflage for the sneaking
      destruction of White Christianity and European nation-states. It is purported to have emanated from the very cream of the Globalist Elites
      operating mainly out of New York City, including of course the Rothschild Cartel. Obama is their Star student and is the enabler for a New World Order based of course in the ' New World, meaning North America. He has a massive plan to disarm White America simultaneously hitting them with constant tax-attacks. He is striving to achieve the 'take-down' of the entire USA within 4 years. It's interesting being a spectator from the other side of the Pond, but utterly tragic for those living in it.

      Delete
    4. The creep lowles is just a sort of media troll inserted to soundbite and
      provoke reactions. People like this NEVER have a shred of evidence for their ludicrous claims. Don't rise to answer his nonsense, give him no answer and no platform.

      Delete
  2. Fly with the crows...

    ReplyDelete
  3. So, just to clarify, can you tell us what percentage of English democrat candidates from the last elections have been BNP members?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only one out of five had ever had any involvement with the BNP, and he came to us from UKIP (who had actively recruited him from the BNP!)

      Delete
  4. I have no doubt that Mr Lowles welcomes the news that I have just become privy to, namely that all of a sudden three more of our cities have gone the way of London and have indigenous English minorities.

    Leicester, which was vying with Birmingham in being the next Afro-Asian city, now has an Asian majority, despite the fact that councillors in the 1970s begged the Kenya/Uganda Asians not to settle there. Slough has likewise, as has Luton; with Birmingham destined to follow by the end of the decade - that probably means before the end of the decade.

    We are not alone, the whole of Western Europe is going from being in the first world to the third. How will this benefit anybody? Presumably one of the former mill towns of Lancashire or Yorkshire will be the next to go. Where are we to run to? Where are you going to run to Mr Lowles? I remember reading a comment from a lady following an article on Blair's further opening of the floodgates to the effect that the whole country is going to be destroyed. Well this is now obvious. I also read a comment from somebody whose aged father had returned to Birmingham for a funeral having not visited the city since the 1950s. He cried all the way into the city and all the way back out again. Is this all we now have left, our tears?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You ask, "How is this going to benefit anybody?". It benefits the cosmopolitan international capitalism which Cameron and his cronies represent, and all those billionaires who could end the world poverty,(four times over) which leads Africans and Asians to leave their own countries to seek lives in Europe. International capital's aim is to bring European living standards down to third world levels.

      Delete
    2. Mayor Boris Johnson has taken London a step further down the road to becoming a separate country like Wales or Scotland, and making himself the First Minister of Londonia/Londonistan by appointing a financial adviser, in effect, his own Chancellor of the Exchequer.

      Delete
    3. Chief among those billionaires must be those in "booming" India who presumably could stop their own people starving or flooding into Europe but choose not to do so. They prefer to rely on Britain and other European countries looking after them as in the past by sending them aid and giving them lebensraum and a square meal in Britain or elsewhere. I would be interested to know if anybody starved in the days of the Raj. I know that in Rhodesia as was all the blacks were fed, clothed and educated. A bit of a change now; perhaps their leaders there could help to feed them instead of Europeans by not stuffing millions away in Swiss bank accounts.

      Delete
  5. This Hate not Hope band brands the English Democrats on their website as a "Hate Group". The guff that is written about us includes no mention of any "hateful" speeches of writings (because there aren't any); does cite an attendance by Robin at a "No Sharia Here" function, (that's not hatred,) and also cites the fact that a number of prominent E.D.P. members are former B.N.P. members; the operative word here being "former", surely. Our party expresses reasonable points of view in reasonable language. The "hatred" stems from "Hate not Hope" whose hatred of anything to do with England or of anyone promoting her interests is self-evident.
    Clive,
    Weston-super-Mare.

    ReplyDelete
  6. More to the point, perhaps, Robin, is did you meet with the EDL and BF people, and, if so, why?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why is that to the point at all? I meet many people, and will continue to do so without being frightened off by Labourite dirty tricks. My aim is to convert everyone to moderate English Nationalism and to that end I have offered to debate with even anti-English Nick!

      Delete
    2. I believe the "point" to be that we must not supply people like old Nick with ammunition. I firmly believe in debate. (that is why had no qualms about Nick Griffin's appearing on "Question Time.") There is nothing wrong with talking to people, regardless of their political persuasion. Indeed, it is good to do so.
      However, in these days of "Politically Correct" when it is so easy to invalidate a point of view and thus, the person presenting it, there is a need to be "up-front" about the people so talked to, together with the aims and outcomes of such talks. "Get your blow in, first!"
      I confess to not knowing how influential this "Hate not Hope" set-up is, but by telling everyone, who has been approached and the response, its scope for negative propaganda diminishes almost to nothing.
      Clive,
      Weston-super-Mare.

      Delete
    3. quite right, "political correctness" or "left bullying", to be accurate, has to be confronted

      Delete
  7. Perhaps Mr Lowles & HNH should name those who are the alleged supporters of Hitler, what rally they were last spotted at and show us the pictures of everybody in uniform who attended.

    And if its not too difficult, would he like to define what a racist is and in his wildest dreams how he can relate that to the English Democrats regardless of any meetings attended. Seeing as a GCSE-Level pupil would know that racism is to claim superiority between races does he have a different understanding of the word that he'd like to share with everybody?

    Normal people and especially those in politics aimed at making a genuine and positive difference regard engaging with others across the spectrum a form of communication, learning and sometimes finding an understanding leading to support, but maybe this is something Mr Lowles lacks or just plain misunderstands - preferring to be an invisible keyboard 'warrior' instead. Then again, perhaps that is his role at HNHope it being just one of many Labour HQ orchestrated schools of subversion. In which case he should think about his party's recent history and who the likes of Blair, Hain, Straw etc concerted with around these shores and globally. But that's a whole different thing, isn't it.

    Clearly Mr Lowles knows nothing of the slander laws in England, or maybe its just he thinks he's immune to them. If he won't come out into the open and discuss his rantings in a rational manner, then perhaps his attention should be brought to the latest retraction by a national newspaper, the Sunday Times who affirm that English Democrats are a Nationalist party and not 'right wing extremists!' or otherwise. And that if he can't see sense and continues slandering in the manner he does that he might like to consider getting his 'professional' indemnity insurance sorted out and not assume claims could be covertly settled through his party, Labour.

    Its clear that Labour are worried about having lost their vote to other parties including English Democrats but to trot out the bogeyman words like a wind up clockwork soldier just shows desperation apart from anything else. The term 'racist', 'nazi' etc have lost their currency as has 'bigot' - and which is something else that Labour are VERY sensitive about these days as it was a major part of their last Prime Minister's downfall, another thing he should remember.

    The electorate are far more clued up on such things these days - perhaps he should remember that also.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Robin he has posted again calling you out over:

    * That he attended a meeting with racists and fascists? I think the photo speaks for itself.

    * That 43% of English Democrat candidates in the 2012 local elections had until recently been in the BNP? The candidates' names are there in black and white.

    * That the English Democrats did a deal with the miniscule nazi group England First at the last European Elections in a bid to prevent Nick Griffin winning a seat in the North West? Just ask Ed Abrams, the party's lead North West candidate, who has since walked out of the party over their increasing links with racists and nazis.

    Also it calls ED a "hate group".

    Why don't you sue them over these lies? That would shut them up!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Attacking yes but still not willing to face me in debate!
      Unfortunately there is no point in suing an organisationb that has no money.

      Delete
    2. Hope Not Hate have LOADS of money. They are very well funded. Look into it and you will see.

      http://www.borderland.co.uk/index.php/sport-mainmenu-28/12-searchlighthopenothate.html

      Delete
  9. Although I become annoyed at the lack of consideration for the natives they are bent on replacing, I do not hate those who, given the chance by our political leaders, have flooded into Europe and other hitherto homogeneous white countries.

    They are merely fodder, the tools of the Bilderbergers and their Marxist useful idiots whose one aim, stated in the 1920s, is to bring down Western Christian Civilisation.

    However, I am surprised that, because those in power seem to think that the new arrrivals are our superiors, those landing here have not worked out for themselves that they have only been brought here for one reason.

    By the way, Enoch Powell expressed a reasonable point of view in reasonable language - although he did use some hyperbole to add to his oratory - but it did not prevent him being silenced by the above people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ordinary folk are past caring about what they say. The lady on Question Time from Lincoln showed that. One cannot hide from the impact of immigration, it is detrimentally affecting every service in the country and will continue and get worse. If reasonable action is not undertaken soon, which is unlikely, the powder keg of latent resentment of ordinary working people will explode. The 17th century English civil wars were bloody and brutal, the next will be worse.

      Delete
    2. What did the lady from Lincoln say? and was she not put in a straightjacket and taken away for re-education like Emma West? How did she slip throught the BBC's politically correct Marxist screening net?

      Delete
    3. Enoch's point of view may have been reasonable but I'm not sure that his language was. I believe there was a reference to "rivers of blood?"
      Clive,
      Weston-super-Mare.

      Delete
    4. That was my reference to hyperbole and oratory. However, quite a few hundred gallons of blood must have run down the gutters that would not have done if Heath had let Powell have his way; from 7/7/ to Stephen Lawrence to all the indigenous English murdered by those of exotic extraction etc etc and as the demographics change there may be a lot more.

      Delete
    5. with over 50% of babies being born to non-English mothers, is it any wonder there are not enough midwifes?

      Delete
  10. Why do Nick Lowles and his fellow travellers attack English nationalism in this way, but not Scottish, Welsh and Irish nationalisms?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The answer is simple, Irish, Scottish and Welsh nationalism are anti-English and the above, as are those of our former colonies overseas, are, in his eyes, victims of the English so their revenge must be encouraged and they must be allowed to flourish.

      I could say that much was down to the Normans and William of Orange and that even Oliver Cromwell was of Norman descent but it won't make much difference to him.

      In the view of Mr Lowles the English are the victimisers of most of the globe and are not worth saving or must be thrown to the baying crowd of those they are deemed to have wronged.
      Mr Lowles' - is he of English or Celtic or other extraction? - seething hatred is for the English. Well the best of luck when we have been replaced by our former colonials. Yes I know this is not your view Robin.

      Delete
    2. I have no idea but I wouldn't be at all surprised if he was of Jewish descent as many Jews have no problem with the Zionist nationalism of the Israeli government but if we Europeans espouse similar nationalist sentiments we are evil hate-filled bigots who should be condemmed at all times.

      Delete
    3. Indeed, the English are seen by the self-loathing hand-wringing lib-left-wing haters of England and the English as the 'victimisers' of the world who should therefore in their tiny minds be crushed to salve their collective conscience -- BAH!!.. Sorry … BAH!! there it goes again …a little sheep just popped up somewhere, but don't worry…. BAH! … LOWLES… get down there you silly little kid. Down kiddy… There..

      But why else do they exist.. what is their purpose other than to be bitter and twisted about the most successful people of the past thousand years? Such people as those who Mr Lowles clearly HatesNotHelps have done more for the world pre and post -industrialisation since the Greeks, Egyptians and Romans. So why does he front an organisation named HateNotHope4Labour if he is such a clever and intelligent fellow?

      What a shame that he won't come out and tell everybody all about it, explain himself and his beliefs and what he stands for, debate with people as adults, share and learn something - perhaps even how utterly misguided his beliefs actually are - rather than hiding in his parents bedroom playing X-Box and 'keyboard warrior' with his betters and getting a pat on the head from his Labour handlers once in a while for his troubles.

      Ready when you are Mr Lowles. Or rather when you're feeling brave enough, kiddo.

      Delete
    4. His grandparents would have been well aware of the contribution that the English have made to the world and Europeans in general and that this has far outweighed the harm they have done. The Japanese and the Chinese have done a lot of harm as well but do not even talk about a sense of guilt, they just refuse to talk about it and only emphasise their good points and their victimisation at the hands of Europeans. And we had better not even start to talk about the Arabs.

      I don't know how old Mr Lowles is but he has probably been subjected to the Marxist education of the last 40 to 50 years which has taught those under 50 that the white man is bad and everybody else is good. The savage is indeed noble. Rousseau made that mistake until he came up against the truth and then he changed his mind.

      Delete
  11. Forced mixer race marriage. Made by loony lefties. Note almost all adds on tv and magazine show White blond woman and black male. 20 years of indoctrination of Young White girls by media. Result highest mixed children in world. Tony benn labour saddened he wont be around to see when uk is more mixed race than White. !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tony Benn always was pretty bonkers and has suffered from the guilt of his priveleged background. Now he is proving that he is totally insane. I hate to mention this as it is an unpalatable subject to broach and makes me feel pretty bad but perhaps he should compare the iq levels of whites in South Africa with others, even those of mixed race. It runs something like 100 to 85 to 80 to 70.

      Delete
    2. Robin, I am adding to this comment and don't care if you bar me because it needs saying. I have my own interpretation of the Mayan prophecy as not the end of the world but the point at which the human race could cease to advance and go backwards if nothing is done.

      Civilisation is on the cusp as the white race is on the cusp of extinction. Consider which race has contributed most towards the advancement of the human species. I would ask Mr Lowles to consider what the world would have been like if that race had never existed and what the world would be like tomorrow if went. He can call me a white supremicist but I am just asking him to look at the facts in terms of iq levels, scientific achievement, inventions that have benefitted mankind etc.

      As regards our "sins" what about, the unspeakable cruelty of the Japanese during World War 2, and of most orientals for whom life is cheap. The cruelty of the Chinese during the Mao era and in Tibet. The cruelty of Africans towards other tribes, the practice of putting tyres around people's necks and setting them alight. In India it was only the British who banned sutti much to the Hindus' annoyance, the barbaric practice of forcing widows to throw themselves on their husbands' funeral pyres. There also Hindus and Muslims have massacred one another. And just imagine if our working classes were left to starve because they were deemed to be untouchable. Muslims have been engaged in slavery and forced conversion for 1500 years and still are. None of these sees any need to apologise or feel guilty. The Japanese won't even teach their children what they did.

      Europeans must stop punishing themselves. The English must regain their pride in their tremendous European civilisation which has been beaten out of them by the Left or we will go under as will our cousins in North America and on the Continent and in the Antipodes. I repeat again Kenneth Clarke's closing words at the end of his "Civilisation" series. European civilisation will only go down if we lose confidence in ourselves. We must regain our confidence pronto or we will be gone and the world will regress with our disappearance.

      As regards the Left, taking Tony Benn as an example - The Rt Hon Anthony Wedgwood Benn to be exact - I have sussed him. Guilty of his priveleged position he could not live with his family's past as regards not only this country but the British Empire. So he decided to end if all. But he did not have the courage to destroy himself so he decided to destroy his seed for ever. So he encouraged his children to marry non-whites so that their heritage would be destroyed. And he saw his fellow English as part of his kith and kin so they must be destroyed in the same manner also to assuage his guilt.

      This is the masochism of the Left. They loathe themselves for being part of a race they see as tainted but not having the courage to destroy themselves they opt to bring the temple crashing down on top of us all and expunge the tainted race. They are insane and their actions are worse than those of Hitler. For with Hitler we would have been able to fight back. They refuse to leave us that option - thus far. But like Hitler they are bent on genocide of a race whom they see as the root of all evil.
      We must learn from the actions of Churchill and Alfred the Great, especially the latter, or we are lost and our race with us.

      Delete
  12. The question of why so many BNP members are now ex-members is relevant to this. It seems to me there was a major falling out regarding democracy in that party and how its affairs were being run. It's now a shadow of its former self and 'hope not hate' has those former members to thank for that. They probably just don't like nationalism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suspect that Nick Lowles and his cronies are worried that they might have to go and get proper jobs!

      Delete
    2. That is totally correct, Robin. Mr Lowles like many self-loathing lefties has a fertile imagination ( I would say deranged) and has imagined a fantasy 'threat' of the rise of 'fascism' in his own mind and this creates a 'need' for fighting it. It is, of course, non-existent but he needs to imagine it is there in order to provide himself with a job.

      Delete
    3. If Mr Lowles wants to see a fascist then I suggest that he looks in the mirror. Churchill said that the next fascism would be anti-fascism. By this he could have foreseen that the Left would take the homogeneous stable countries of Europe and transform them to suit their one world totalitarian multicultural utopianist agenda and crush any opposition to this unwanted change on the part of Europe's indigenous peoples with the accusation that they were racists, bigots and fascists.

      Mr Lowles and his ilk are the fascists who for the last 50 plus years have ensured that any legitimate and understandable opposition on the part of the indigenous peoples involved to the unwanted transformation and gradual theft of their countries would be disallowed and have now driven it to stalinist proportions.

      To me it is a mystery as to why people should be forced to surrender their national identity to meet the insane demands of these little Hitlers or Stalins. To stifle free speech, democracy and a nation's understandable desire to resist is little less than fascistic. There is little difference between Marxism and Nazism, they are both basically totalitarian socialism.

      And what is more both were and are engaged in genocide in order to achieve what they believe is the ideal state, note I did not say nation, as they believe that all nations and indigenous races and cultures in European countries should be abolished to the point where Swedish leftist politicans say there was no native culture in Sweden and what there was was rubbish.

      The problem is who will help us to defeat these fascists of the extreme left who purport that the accepted wisdom of 60 years ago as regards the homogeneous nation state is the fascism of the far right. And in true fascist tradition they will brook no debate or opposition.

      Delete
  13. Now they are saying EDs are "the stupid party" for creating a street gang of thugs.

    http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/2470/are-the-english-democrats-the-stupid-party

    DEFINITELY nip this in the bud for God's sake.

    ReplyDelete