Total Visits

Monday, 31 October 2016

Muslim protester found guilty of racist abuse crime!

This intriguing item appeared on the BBC website on Friday, 28th October.

Race relations worker guilty of racist abuse at refugee rally

Here is what it said:-

“A race relations worker has been convicted of racially abusing a group of Scots at a rally to welcome Syrian refugees to Scotland.

Shafiq Mohammed, 50, was also found guilty of resisting arrest at a demonstration in Monkton, South Ayrshire, on 15 November 2015.

The former Scottish Refugee Council worker broke through a police cordon to verbally abuse a woman and three men.

The rally took place hours after the Paris terrorist attacks.

Ayr Sheriff Court heard how tempers flared among members of the Scottish Defence League and pro-refugee demonstrators.

It followed 150 refugees being granted emergency accommodation at the Ayrshire town's Adamton Country House Hotel.

Mohammed denied behaving in a racially aggravated manner which was intended to cause alarm and distress.

He claimed the four witnesses had conspired to make up the allegations against him.

Sheriff Robert Weir QC found him guilty on both charges and sentence was deferred.

The court heard Mohammed had previously worked for property firm Orchard & Shipman, which has been paid more than £60m to house refugees in Scotland.

He is currently involved in the Asylum Seeker Housing (ASH) Project - an organisation campaigning on asylum seeker housing issues in the west of Scotland.”

Here is the link to the original >>>

So it sounds like we should congratulate the Scottish Police and the Scottish Prosecution service for doing their duty in arresting and in prosecuting this man. If only the police and CPS in England could be relied upon to
similarly do their duty when aggressive anti-English racists are active here in England!

The law is quite clear that anti-Englishness (or anti-Scottishness) is just as illegal as any other so call “hate crime”. The difference in treatment is simply a political matter not a legal one.

Here is the section 4A of the Public Order Act which is what “Shafiq” appears to have been convicted of.

“4A Intentional harassment, alarm or distress.

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,

thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the person who is harassed, alarmed or distressed is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(b)that his conduct was reasonable.

(4)F2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(5)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.”

Click here for the original>>>

So what sort of sentence has the Judge deferred the sentencing process in order to consider social workers' reports? Such deferral means that the Judge is considering imprisonment. Here is the relevant section of the CPS sentencing guidelines:-


Prosecutors have a duty to present all relevant material to allow the court to pass sentence in accordance with the law. Racial or religious aggravation makes an offence more serious and the court has a duty to take this into account when it sentences a defendant.

Prosecutors must neither minimise nor omit relevant and admissible evidence of racial or religious aggravation.

Prosecutors should also make sure that they are aware of the guideline cases to assist the court in sentencing, in particular R v Kelly & Donnelly [2001] 2 Cr. App. R. (S) 73 CA which adopted the majority of recommendations made to the Court of Appeal by the Sentencing Advisory Panel Advice No 4.

The Court of Appeal endorsed the following approach:

the court should first decide on the appropriate sentence without the element of racial or religious aggravation, but including any other aggravating or mitigating features;

the sentence should then be enhanced to take account of the racial or religious aggravation;

if the offence itself merits custody, that sentence should be enhanced by an appropriate amount to reflect the degree of racial or religious aggravation;

the judge should say publicly what the appropriate sentence would have been without the racial or religious aggravation.

Although the original guidance applies to offences charged as specific racially aggravated offences and to all other offences where section 145 Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies, it should also be taken as applying to religiously aggravated offences, following the amendment to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.”

Click here for original >>>

What all this shows is that it is possible to get Leftist agitators arrested, charged and convicted but much more effort by English Nationalists is required in making the police arrest and charge those guilty of any illegal anti-English behaviour here in England.

Then we might have our multiculturalist opponents writing many more items like this one:-

Support Shafiq Fundraiser - THIS SUNDAY

"The Glad Cafe and Glasgow Campaign to Welcome Refugees

Support Shafiq Fundraiser - Sunday 22nd May 2016

An evening of music with Robin Adams, Kathryn Joseph, Alasdair Roberts, DJ Kwaby and others,

Featuring previews from the new album REFUGEE 

Alasdair Roberts + Kathryn Joseph + Robin Adams + DJ Kwaby + more

Sunday 22 May 19:30 £5.00 minimum donation

Entry Requirements: Over 18s only

Line up • Alasdair Roberts • Kathryn Joseph • Robin Adams • DJ Kwaby • more

Shafiq needs your support - legal, moral, financial and physical!

On 15th November 2015, Shafiq Mohammed was arrested at an anti-racist demonstration in support of refugees. He is awaiting trial, charged with Racially Aggravated Breach of the Peace and Resisting Arrest (details below).

Here is how you can help

Witnesses — URGENTLY NEEDED. His lawyer is seeking witnesses. If you saw Shafiq at any point during the demonstration, please get in touch. Contact the lawyer, John Harper of McClure Collins.


Telephone: 0141 423 7181

Several people were filming and taking photos. These could be valuable evidence. Please use your networks to find anyone who might be able to help.

Messages — In circumstances like these, messages of support, from individuals and/ or organisations can make a big difference to an individual’s morale. Please send messages of support to:

Financial — His campaign will need financial support. In particular, legal support is not cheap and will need to be paid for. Please use the Paypal button below to send any donations.

Send cheques to GCtWR, C/o FBU, 52 St Enoch Square, Glasgow G1 4AA

At the courtroom — He will need support on the day of his trial, both inside and outside the courtroom. Given SDL members will be witnesses against him, they are likely to organise some sort of presence. We need to outnumber them substantially. The trial date has been re-set for Tuesday 9 June 2016. We will let you know the time when we have it.

Support Shafiq Mohammed

On Sunday November 15, at the demonstration in Monkton to support the refugees being housed in Adamton Country House Hotel and against the Scottish Defence League (SDL) who had declared their intention to demonstrate in the village, one of the anti-racist demonstrators was arrested. He was Shafiq Mohammed, one of the few black faces there. He was kept overnight in police cells in Kilmarnock and then appeared on the Monday afternoon at Ayr Sheriff Court. Shafiq has been charged with racially aggravated breach of the peace and resisting arrest. Apparently one of the SDL women accused him of calling her child a "white bastard" and the police chose to act on it. He has pled not guilty and John Harper of McClure Collins is representing him.

Due to the rough treatment he received when being arrested, he suffered a burst blood vessel in his eye and permanent facial injuries. The handcuffs caused severe cuts and grazing encircling his wrists. In custody, as a result of indicating his dietary requirement for halal food, he was given 4 cereal bars to eat in 24 hours.

Shafiq is a respected professional advocate and consultant in the area of race relations. He has worked for Orchard & Shipman, Ypeople, Migrant Help and the Scottish Refugee Council. He currently gives advice to and is a crucial part of the Asylum Seeker Housing (ASH) Project, an organisation which campaigns on asylum seeker housing issues in the West of Scotland. He has no previous history with the police and indeed this was the first ant-racist, pro-refugee demonstration he had ever attended, having previously been concerned his attendance at such events would compromise his professional standing.

He is understandably deeply distressed. Bad enough being put through this but more so, having suffered racist abuse all his life, to be attending a demonstration against racism and to be accused by the racists of racism and have the police act upon it, is beyond irony. In his case it is unbearable. Further a conviction for racially aggravated breach of the peace could have a particularly detrimental effect on his career.

We cannot allow the SDL to get away with this tactic of picking out individuals from counter demonstrations and making false accusations against them, even more so, if they are black. Support Shafiq Mohammed.

Jock Morris
Glasgow Campaign to Welcome Refugees”

Click here for original article>>>


We English nationalists need to take note that the reason that the Scottish Police, Prosecution Service and Courts are taking a more even handed approach to anti-Scottishness is political. Their police authority and those that are appointed to head the prosecution service and in charge of the appointments and promotion systems for the judiciary are all dominated by the Scottish National Party.

So another lesson for English nationalists is that we also need to get people elected to the one similar position that is feasible here in England – Police and Crime Commissioners! Then we too could order the police to be far more robust with the Shafiq’s and Jock Morris’s in their relevant police force areas!


  1. This proves that the Scottish Police and Scottish Prosecution Service have not yet been subverted. Perhaps the Scottish Parliament has ensured this.

    I am sure if England has an English Parliament there would have been no MacPherson report, little or no child grooming, very few no go areas.

    Those most opposed to English self government have something to hide. They know that they will made accountable and severely punished. This is why Brexit is being resisted even after we have voted to Leave. Very soon we are going to have to take the law into our own hands.

    Let's pray for a Trump victory on 8th November.


  2. I have a theory that the Scots, despite the SNP leadership wanting to fill a city the size of Glasgow with immigrants, telling refugees to flock there and wanting Scotland to be as colourful as length of plaid, will not put up with mass immigration the way the more docile English have.
    Already it seems that there the tail is beginning to wag the dog.

    I posted a comment which does not appear to have made it to the screen, namely that Black Lives Matter (British Branch) is engaged in a poster campaign to highlight the fact that black people are six times more likely to be stopped and searched than the natives and all coloured peoples three times more likely. This is all because of not just the institutional racism of the police and the establishment in general against them but because England is just a nasty and thoroughly racist place.

    Well, perhaps these people should sit back and consider the world from our point of view and that of most other European nations, homogeneous nations established for thousands if not tens of thousands of years with minimal immigration for a thousand years in the case of England and a moat of sea closing it off from the rest of the world.
    Previous immigration had mostly been of people of the same race, culture and religion. All of a sudden in the last 70 years we have been forced, with no democratic mandate, to take in peoples from all over the globe who are totally alien and can never been assimilated, not even integrated a large number of them. As Enoch Powell said, peoples of different races will always be foreign to the natives. Marauding Vikings were racially and culturally easy to assimilate and as Powell said, once rapidly Christianised, formed an Anglo-Danish state.

    Is it now time, before it is too late and bloodshed the only outcome, as Powell ultimately predicted, to sit down and work out how vast numbers of people can be peaceably resettled? It is obvious that constant interracial and intercultural and interreligious friction - we have yet to have the battle between Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims - will continue for centuries if it ends at all. I remember reading an article a few years ago about Wexham Park Hospital in Slough where blacks and Asians complained that their white colleagues had remarked that they were "not our sort". This about sums up the crux of the matter. Only racial homogeneity produces stable and strong countries. The opposite leads in time to a weak and disconnected state as the United States is showing increasingly as a white minority is on the horizon.

  3. Hope my comment about their plans to close down the internet and blame a Russian cyber attack will appear. In the meantime, here is one to run with, Robin. On RT UK News last night we heard of a new report about the "dwindling white British population in our major towns and cities". The report had been prepared by an American called Eric Kaufmann, presumably of an ethnic minority himself. When asked if this is white flight, he replied no because the whites are not afraid. They just preferred to be in areas which were more familiar. I think that is white flight, Eric. The change between 2001 and 2011 was quite staggering with Birmingham soon to join a white minority area.

    When asked about a solution, Eric said that in Singapore where there is mostly social housing, residents are forced to live with other ethnic groups. But here where there is more private housing that is not possible. However, he suggested that the government should move non-whites out into white areas. This goes to show that multiculturalism, like all Marxist concepts, is only workable if coercion is applied. The English are meant to be a potentially violent people. If this happens then perhaps that will be the moment when they will show it. This self-segregation is just further proof that ethnic pluralism does not work. And if, as a friend has suggested, they stage false flags attack in ethnic areas as an excuse to move immigrants into "white" areas then we will have to take to the boats and head for the Continent to be met by the "refugees" in mid-Channel or our fellow Europeans escaping from their countries as well.