MP says that the "vast majority" of people breaking lockdown rules are from the “Immigrant and Asian population”.

 

A Conservative MP told LBC that the "vast majority" of people breaking lockdown rules are from the “immigrant and Asian population”.

The Government's announced a ban on different households meeting indoors in parts of northern England - in response to a spike in coronavirus cases. They won't be allowed to mix in each other's homes or gardens, or in places like pubs and restaurants.

The restrictions affect more than 4 million people across Greater Manchester and parts of east Lancashire and West Yorkshire. This follows the restrictions that are already in place in Leicester.

Craig Whittaker is MP for the Calder Valley, one of the areas that has been affected. He told Ian Payne that it is Muslim and BAME communities who have not been obeying lockdown rules.

He said: "What I have seen in my constituency is that there are sections of the community that are not taking the pandemic seriously."

Ian clarified that he was talking about the Muslim community and Mr Whittaker responded: "Of course.

"If you look at the areas where we've seen rises and cases, the vast majority - but not by any stretch of the imagination all areas - it is the BAME communities that are not taking this seriously enough.

"I've been challenging our local leaders for three weeks, asking what we are doing to target these areas to let people know that this is a very serious problem. Until people take it seriously, we're not going to get rid of this pandemic.

"We have areas of high multiple occupancy - when you have multiple families living in one household. It doesn't specifically have to be in the Asian community, but that is the largest proportion.

"Look at the areas. You've got Bradford, Calderdale, Kirklees. Bradford and Kirklees have two of the largest populations in West Yorkshire."

Again Ian clarified that he was referring to the immigrant population and the MP said: "Immigrant and Asian population."

Here is a full transcript of the interview between Ian Payne of LBC & Craig Whittaker, Conservative MP for Calder Valley on 31^st July 2020:-

CW – We are told about households mixing whether that is indoors, in any settings and I can say in Calder Valley they are doing that incredibly well and taking huge amounts of caution, but sadly we have got other areas where they are just not taking the Pandemic seriously.

IP – Can I ask, and this is quite a brutal question, but I will ask it anyway, is this something to do with EID and the Muslim community? 

CW – Well it is nothing to do with EID so far as I am concerned, but what I have seen in my constituency that we have areas of our community and sections of our community that are just not taking the pandemic seriously.

IP – It is a Muslim community.

CW – Of course and if you look at the areas where we have seen rises in cases, the vast majority, not by any stretch the most imagination all areas, but it is the only community who are not taking this seriously enough.

IP – Blimey – you could come in for a lot of criticism with this.  Are you ready for it?

CW – Yeah. Absolutely but you know I have been challenging our local leaders now for two weeks at least, in fact three weeks, asking what are we doing to target these areas to let people know that this is still a very serious problem and until people take it seriously then we are not going to get rid of this pandemic. 

IP – So what we are talking about here is a specific part of the community who tends to meet in what, each other’s houses in large numbers? 

CW – Well yeah, it is not just the Asian community of course in our areas but its

IP – Sounds like it

CW – Well we also have areas of high multiple occupancy that are in the same boat, but the majority

IP – What do you mean by that?  High occupancy.  What do you mean?

CW – Well where you have multiple families within one household and that doesn’t specifically have to be the Asian community, but that is the largest proportion.  I mean you look at all the areas.  You’ve got Bradford, Calderdale, Kirklees and we have Bradford and Kirklees who have two of the largest populations in West Yorkshire.

IP – Right so we are talking about immigrant communities are we?

CW – We are.

IP – Yeah okay.

CW – Well immigrant and Asian population.

Here is a link to the original>>>

https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/ian-payne/muslim-bame-communities-coronavirus-pandemic/

What the multi-culturalist British Establishment don’t want you to know about the Reading Jihadi attack

What the multi-culturalist British Establishment don’t want you to know about the Reading Jihadi attack

On the evening of Saturday, 20^th June shortly before 7.00 p.m. reports started to come out that there had been a stabbing attack at the end of a “Black Lives Matter” demonstration in Forbury Gardens in Reading, Berkshire - in the heart of England. 

Sure enough the usual “Coulter’s Law” (“the longer it takes the news media to identify a mass shooter (in the United States) the less likely it is to be a white male”) applied to the reporting.  We were told nothing about the ethnicity, nor the religion of the attacker, nor about what he was shouting as he cut the throats of his victims. 

So far as I could see all the Mainstream Media were initially claiming that there was no “terror” motive.  For the BBC at least this denial continued until about midday on Sunday. 

Curiously in between we had had a flurry of calls by Leftists including the Leader and the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, Angela Rayner, not to share any videos or information about what had happened.

Whilst we are used to the Left telling us that Islamist Jihadi attacks are now “part and parcel of living in a modern city” (Sadiq Khan), what we are not so used to is the Left trying to dampen down the story. 

So it looked as if there might be more to this story than usual. 

One thing that occurred to me that it might be that the Left were worried that this attack might take the media focus of their neo-Maoists “Black Lives Matter” Cultural Revolution and that they were trying to minimise the impact on that campaign. 

But the sheer extent, of the effort to dampen down social media reporting of what had happened, suggested that there might be a further motive.  More of that later.

In the meanwhile it came out that just as Coulter’s Law would have expected the perpetrator was a young, male, Muslim, Libyan “refugee” with, so far as one could tell, little education or skill that would be likely to be of any use in the job market in a developed country, like England.  He also has too much of a violent and criminal history.

Here is what the Independent said about him:- 

“Libyan national Khairi Saadallah named as suspect

The suspect arrested over a terror attack that left three victims dead in Reading is a Libyan national called Khairi Saadallah, The Independent understands.

Saadallah, 25, was jailed last year for assaulting an emergency worker and has a lengthy criminal history, our home affairs correspondent Lizzie Dearden reports.

In court proceedings last August, over the assault of a judge who was sentencing him for previous offences, his address was given as Basingstoke Road in Reading.

That is the address of the suspect’s home, which was searched by heavily-armed counter terror officers on Saturday night.

Neighbours at the flat block in Whitley, just under two miles from the scene of the mass stabbing, believed he had been recently released from prison”.

Evidently he has all too much Islamism in his world view too!

The questions that arise for both Labour and for the Conservative British Establishment parties is of course why they have been allowing unskilled, illegal immigrants from war torn Muslim countries to come here, to live off our benefits, and to be housed in our social housing, whilst our own peoples' benefits and social housing opportunities are being cut?  Also why wasn't such an undesirable violent offender not deported after serving his sentence for his first conviction?   

Then of course we have had another display of the, now all too familiar, selective, dishonest and biased reporting by the “Main Stream Media”.

In this particular case we also have an explanation, in the identity of the victims, for why Labour and the Left (and their enablers) became so unusually hysterical about trying to close down reporting. 

It turns out that there had been a “Black Lives Matter” demonstration in that park which had recently finished and that the group that were attacked had, not only been in attendance at that demonstration, but were leading Leftists within Labour’s multi-culturalist Rainbow Alliance, in this case for the LGBTQ+ falange. 

Indeed the first victim’s identity which was disclosed was that of a local politics teacher, Mr James Furlong who had also been a local leading campaigner for 'Refugees Welcome'. 

So it seems as if a representative of Labour's refugee “community”, who is also a member of their “Muslim Community” had been repeatedly plunging his knife into leading representatives of the gay “community” who had been active within the “Black Lives Matter” neo-Maoist group! 

No wonder when they are trying to smash our “Four Olds” (“Old customs, old culture, old habits and old ideas”), that the Neo-Maoist’s should be so alarmed over part of the Rainbow Alliance attacking another part and of diverting attention away from them and on to a real problem of multi-culuralism!

Also I do wonder what all the Establishment figures meant by saying that they will learn lessons from this incident.  Any ideas?  Any suggestions? (Even facetious ones!).