IS JEREMY CORBYN JUST ANOTHER DECEITFUL POLITICIAN?
On the 17th August Jeremy Corbyn was interviewed by the BBC. The interview went as follows:-
Jeremy Corbyn:-
“I don’t think you can label the whole community. I think what you have to do is label those that perpetrate disgusting and disgraceful crimes against people and they can be from any community. They can be white, they can be black, they can be any community and they have to be dealt with as the crime of what it is.”
BBC interviewer:-
“Do you not think it is a problem with Pakistani men because we have seen in Rochdale, in Rotherham, Newcastle and Oxford that being the problem?”
Jeremy Corbyn replied:-
“The problem is the crime that is committed against women from any community. Much crime is committed by white people. Crime is committed by other communities as well. I think it is wrong to designate an entire community as the problem. What I think is right is to deal with problems, the safety and security and vulnerability of often young women who can be groomed by all kinds of people into some awful and dangerous situations.”
BBC interviewer:-
“Did you sack Sarah Champion?”
Jeremy Corbyn replied:-
“No she resigned.”
BBC interviewer:-
“Did you sack or did she resign”
Jeremy Corbyn replied:-
“She resigned”.
BBC interviewer:-
“So you did not sack her?”
Jeremy Corbyn replied:-
“She resigned.”
BBC interviewer:-
“If she had not have resigned would you have sacked her?”
Jeremy Corbyn replied:-
“Well she resigned so that is the question.”
BBC interviewer:-
“Do you think she was right to resign?”
Jeremy Corbyn replied:-
“She resigned and I accepted the resignation.”
BBC interviewer:-
“Do you think she was right to resign?”
Jeremy Corbyn replied:-
“Well I accepted her resignation so clearly I did and I thank her for her commitment to the safety of women and the vulnerability of women and championing equalities in this country and I will be working with her in the future.”
(Here is a link to the original >>> Jeremy Corbyn: Wrong to blame 'entire community' for abuse - BBC News).
This interview was in the context of his being asked about Labour’s Shadow “Equalities Secretary”, Sarah Champion, being forced into the position of resigning by him. Jeremy Corbyn repeatedly denied she had been sacked.
The truth was, of course, that he had made it impossible for her to continue. If she had been an employee that would clearly have been a “Constructive Dismissal” situation. So that was Corbyn’s first deception in this interview.
The second deception in the interview was to claim:-
“I don’t think you can label the whole community. I think what you have to do is label those that perpetrate disgusting and disgraceful crimes against people and they can be from any community. They can be white, they can be black, they can be any community and they have to be dealt with as the crime of what it is.”
Sarah Champion had never said, nor indeed has any commentator from any part of the spectrum, so far as I am aware, ever said that the whole of the Pakistani or Muslim community, or the whole of any Muslim community, or indeed the whole of any community whatsoever, is involved in child sexual exploitation.
What Sarah Champion had pointed out however is nothing more or less than the truth, namely that the gangs of exploiters are principally Pakistani Muslim men (but also include other Muslim men) and also that the “ethnicity” of the victims was almost invariably young white English girls.
Jeremy Corbyn then went on to say that:-
“The problem is the crime that is committed against women from any community. Much crime is committed by white people. Crime is committed by other communities as well. I think it is wrong to designate an entire community as the problem. What I think is right is to deal with problems, the safety and security and vulnerability of often young women who can be groomed by all kinds of people into some awful and dangerous situations.”
This was his third deception in the short interview!
Where it is of course true that there are individual paedophiles from all communities, what is certainly not true is that there are gangs of paedophile criminals drugging, raping and prostituting on a hugely profitable commercial scale thousands of young girls from another ethnic or religious group.
The idea that there is any “moral equivalence” is however completely preposterous and shows how far adrift Jeremy Corbyn’s moral compass actually is.
But then that is of course all too true of Labour politicians generally because they are the very Establishment Party that was most involved in protecting the Muslim politician child rape gang members and their “clients” and in closing down any criticism of what was being done and also in concealing it and also in persecuting anybody who opposed that.
So I ask: Is Jeremy Corbyn any more or less deceitful than Tony Blair?
What do you think?
Not a man to trust. How dare he sack Sarah Champion. She is worth 1,0000 times more than this stupid man who lied to students. He is a nasty man.
ReplyDeleteHe seems to think it acceptable to bribe youngsters himself with half truths and untruths... That cannot be fulfilled... Is that not grooming also... albeit of a non sexual kind.
ReplyDeleteAbsolute creep not to be trusted in any way ,how can you trust a person who slept with Diane Abbot,absolute sleaze bag, who looks like he needs a good bath ive seen homeless people cleaner than him a disgrace.
ReplyDeleteBOTH Blair & Corbyn are from the same mould, They thrive on deceit. BLAIR is responsible for ALL the upheaval involving Muslims and the West with his lies about Weapons of Mass destruction, and the subsequent war he brought upon us. CORBYN is hell bent on destroying UK values, and he is determined, if given the chance, to swamp the UK with unwanted foreigners, predominately of the Muslim ilk. BLAIR was NEVER fit to run the UK, and God forbid CORBYN ever does.
ReplyDeleteHe should go back to the I R A. He is unable to answer questions. God help us if he ever became Prime Minister.Nice house,I wonder who paid for it.
ReplyDeletecorbyn you are a pillock and a liar and a sad BASTARD
DeleteI mailed him my copy of Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail.
ReplyDeleteIt's the thought that counts.
It is absurd that Champion was 'Equalities' minister in the first place seeing has she had walloped her husband with a heavy picture frame during a heated row during their divorce, and before her appointment. She received a police caution for domestic violence and screwed £200K out of her better half. At the time the Labour leadership kept it quiet and certainly made no attempt to remove her then.
ReplyDeleteI have commented before that the upheaval in America is down to the fact that that country, which had a population of 150m ( now more than double that ) in the 1950s and as Pat Buchanan has just said was 90% white and 10% black and stable is in the midst of a racial battle which will make South Africa look like a vicarage tea party as whites become a minority in less than 20 years. White children are already in a minority there. When the change comes whites, whom many non-whites there consider all to be racists, will be in the same position as South Africa's whites, attempting to cling to power and facing a power and wealth grab by the non-white majority. At the recent alt-right demonstration in Berkeley, the slogan was, " Say no to Marxism". All three main parties in this country and those on the Continent are signed up to cultural marxism, of which the EU is the chief promulgator. The EU and all western leaders, taking orders from the ultimate rulers of the one world state, believe in racial fusion in the West and the disappearance of the white race. Recently, Russia was accused of aiding the "far right" because one of its members said they looked on Russia as the home of white Christian survival.
ReplyDeleteAnd what did the anti-Marxists receive for saying what they did? they were beaten to a pulp by Antifa, the Black Block, the Marxist equivalent of Hitler's brown shirts. And Trump was condemned for suggesting they were violent and thuggish.
I wonder what will happen next year with the 50th anniversary of Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood speech? It would seem that the puppet masters are aiming to continue what they started when the bankers sent Lenin into Russia to foment a communist revolution there. When post-First World War Germany became their next target with the likes of Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Libesknecht and the Weimar Republic crumbled under hyper-inflation, the Nazis were voted in. It is now becoming obvious that the aim of the financial and industrial elites is to get us in another fight to the death by financing, in the case of George Soros, the left-wing "revolution" underway in the United States.
I think we are approaching a Tower of Babel moment when the whole of the Marxist concept of mass immigration to destroy European national identities and to create the multicultural utopia is about to implode and oil and water are going to separate out again. I predict cessetion by the almost wholly white states in the US. The Mayor of Maisons Laffitte in France has just said that Schengen is over and the EU dream of open borders must end because the refugee/immigrant influx requires internal borders to be closed again. For the US it is easy to build a wall along its southern border but impossible to do the same on all Europe's borders.
The fostering incident in Tower Hamlets, the denial of Asian grooming and the comments about the Notting Hill Carnival by the Met - the end of which will doubtless provoke more Londn riots - and the Grenfell Tower fire reaction are just more indicators of the fact that pluralism does not work, as events in the US are showing and its crisis is here. Angela Merkel has been heckled for suggesting that she was right to open the borders and that Germany would be more colourful and diverse and unified. They fail to accept that diversity is not strength but the opposite and leads ultimately to the collapse of hitherto homogenous nations, as the Marxists want. And now the "far right" in East Germany has plotted to assasinate left-wing politicians because of it all. In a way, they are right to blame them rather than the third world masses flooding in.
As for Jeremy Corbyn, he does seem to have a prediliction for black ladies as he is usually shown in parliament bookended by two ladies of African heritage. I wonder whether his politics and preferences are all a reaction against his white middle class parents and his aim is still, though they are doubtless dead, to upset and shock them to gain their attention.
In many ways Corbyn is just as deceitful as Blair, if not more so.
ReplyDeleteI never thought Labour would receive over 40% of the
English vote again, not even 30% but this high figure is down to two factors. The ever increasing non white voting population who vote very heavily for Labour and Tory incompetence.
Every Nationalist party and movement has been destroyed by the establishment and now they are controlling BREXIT and watering it down.
I'm afraid it's probably too late now to avoid the forthcoming racially motivated civil war.
One needs to read the late Enoch Powell's 1953 speeches concerning the 1948 British Nationality Act, the commonwealth and the rival of the term "British". Yes he was unionist to core, but most of us were brought up to be unionist, then realised that the union had deserted us.
Mr Powell questioned the allegiance many Commonwealth origin British citizens would have the Monarch and wider UK. He warned that the newly independent state of India would be unlikely to make sacrifices to help the Monarch in times of need. Reading between the lines he was saying that the commonwealth subjects wanted access to our lands and resources while denying us the same, wanting UK citizenship as a means to get freebies etc etc. He rose to rank of Brigadier specialising in intelligence. He knew what he was talking about. Of course no one listened then 64 years ago, so why would they listen to him 15 years later in 1968?
The 1948 British Nationality Act along with the assymetric redefining of British Nationality were the Trojan Horses that allowed the non-white invaders to move in and take over. The 1965 and 1968 Race Relations Acts were the statutes that sealed "Ethnic Minority Privilege" in England for over 50 years.
It will take a war to reverse, but that is what is needed.
Heath was as much to blame as Wilson as he did NOTHING to oppose the passage of those two did deadly Bills into law.
I have found out that exposing the double standards of equality legislation really gets the globalists furious.
Just ask Mark Douglas Souster or Arthur Redfearn about their successes against the racist anglophobic UK establishment.
Francis
I've been looking at the situation in N Ireland. Already there are more Roman Catholics than Protestants now. Sinn Vein has courted the Black & Muslim vote while the SDLP has taken the Polish vote.
ReplyDeleteDemographics are further shifting in favour of the Roman Catholic population so it is only a matter of time five years before there is an Irish unification referendum. Two thirds of southern voters support unification and with many of them moving north to escape the little Pakistans around Dublin, the pro unity side will win.
It pains me to say this but demographics will win the unification referendum for the Republican side and there will be nothing the pro Union side can do to reverse it. Its too late for NI now to remain in the UK. I feel sorry for the Protestant and unionist population being betrayed by the nation they wanted to remain a part of.
I am an eighth Irish (Catholic) so one would expect me to support the Republican aim. PIRA however have left a very bitter and unpleasant aftertaste thanks to CIA training, support and US support.
I will however not oppose unification because both Irish RCs and NI Protestants are indigenous, both will be protected regardless.
Perhaps we should hope that the transition happens as smoothly as possible, but Sinn Fein are exactly the wrong party to bring about unification. I've been told Fianna Foil will stand in NI from 2019, perhaps that is a good thing, hopefully they will replace Marxist Sinn Fein as the party for unification. If FF win there, NI becomes theirs.
The NI situation however cannot be copied to the UK or Europe regarding Muslims. Pakistanis and blacks have never been indigenous to our lands, so logically they should not be allowed to decide our future, and notice who are the most vocal remainiacs - yes blacks and Muslims - the very people who should not be deciding our future.
Comparisons of our black and Islamic problems should never be compared to the NI troubles.
In NI one indigenous tribe will triumph over the other indigenous tribe. The Republicans should be grateful that the unionist/ loyalist community kept NI white, ready for their takeover in five or ten years time.
Francis