Total Visits

Wednesday, 27 June 2018



Recently I was interested to read of the launch of a new pro-Brexit group.  This group is particularly interesting because it is a Left-wing patriotic venture.  

Within living memory it would not have raised any eyebrows for there to be a group of Left-wing patriots, but nowadays we are so used to the Left accusing anybody who shows any pride in their Nation of being “Racists” or “Fascists” because the Left has become increasingly Internationalist in its thinking. 
The “Full Brexit” started with a foundation statement which I reproduce here :-


Founding Statement

Brexit offers a historic opportunity for democratic and economic renewal. This opportunity is being squandered by Britain’s political class. The Full Brexit will set out radical arguments for a clean break with the European Union. Instead of the conservative nostalgia of the Eurosceptics, our arguments will put the interests of working people – the majority of citizens – at the centre of the case for a democratic Brexit.

In the EU referendum, British voters seized the opportunity to protest against a politics that offers no real alternatives and an economic model that leaves many behind. The Leave campaign’s slogan, “take back control”, resonated with millions of people whose interests are no longer represented in British politics. For this revolt, Leave voters have been slandered as dupes and racists. The Full Brexit stands up for and with the majority of British people: not just Leavers, but also Remain voters who believe the decision must be respected, and for everyone hungry for meaningful political and economic change.

Eurosceptics rightly complain that powerful elite Remainers are conspiring to sabotage Brexit. But this is not the main reason Brexit is adrift. The real cause is that the entire political class lacks any compelling vision of Britain’s future, leaving most British citizens without effective political representation.

Having lost touch with ordinary people, political parties have retreated into European Union policymaking networks. After decades of integration, few politicians, civil servants or academic experts can now imagine any kind of future outside of the EU. Yet Leave campaigners on the right also lack any positive vision. Nostalgic bluster about “Global Britain” has led only to the sterile argument about free trade agreements versus the Single Market and the Customs Union. This wrangling about trade fails to address the problems that led people to reject the EU.

The problems of low investment, stagnant wages and ageing infrastructure that blight our towns and cities require a much more fundamental reconsideration of Britain’s economic and political model. Lacking ideas about how to tackle the deeper problems, politicians on all sides are defaulting to conservative positions, seeking to minimise change, whether through full single market membership or “regulatory alignment”, mostly to defend vested interests like the City of London.

This lack of vision threatens to neutralise Brexit’s potential to renew our political and economic life. EU rules are not neutral: they lock in a set of neoliberal policies that tightly constrain governments’ capacity to innovate, experiment, and tackle voters’ concerns. By preventing practical redress of voters’ grievances, this corrodes representative democracy. Brexit offers a precious opportunity to change this. If this opportunity is squandered, the public will rightly conclude that voting changes nothing. Disengagement and cynicism will intensify and populism – rampant elsewhere in the EU – will surge, threatening what is left of our parliamentary democracy.

A challenge to the logic that “There is No Alternative” is urgently needed, and this must come from the left. The Full Brexit is not a political party. We do not all agree about each and every policy or document on this website. But we do agree, first, that the left’s proper role is to be the architect of a better, more democratic future and, second, that a clean break with the EU is needed to realise that potential.
To this end, we will provide analysis of the present political situation and proposals for the future. We will engage with the public, politicians and anyone who shares our democratic ethos. And we will conduct our work in solidarity with those on the left in other European countries to develop a genuinely internationalist and democratic politics of national sovereignty.

Brexit offers an unprecedented opportunity to reshape Britain for the better. Please join us in that mission.

Founding Signatories

​Christopher Bickerton, University of Cambridge
Philip Cunliffe, University of Kent
Paul Embery, Trade Unionists Against the EU
Thomas Fazi, Author and Journalist
Maurice Glasman, House of Lords
David Goodhart, Author and Journalist
Matthew Goodwin, University of Kent
Pauline Hadaway, University of Manchester
James Heartfield, Author and Journalist
Kevin Hickson, University of Liverpool
Lee Jones, Queen Mary University of London
Costas Lapavitsas, School of Oriental and African Studies
Martin Loughlin, London School of Economics
Tara McCormack, University of Leicester
Jasper Miles, Goldsmiths College, University of London
Peter Ramsay, London School of Economics
Richard Tuck, Harvard University​
Bruno Waterfield, Journalist
Philip B Whyman, University of Central Lancashire
Suke Wolton, Regents Park College, University of Oxford

Prof Mary Davis, London; Anshu Srivastava, Architect and Community Organiser; Prof William Mitchell, University of Newcastle, Australia; Prof Danny Nicol, University of Westminster; Prof Phil Hammond, London South Bank University; Dr Paul Stott, SOAS University of London; Dr Jim Butcher, Canterbury Christ Church University; Jonathan Rutherford, Writer; Dr George Hoare, London; Kevin McCullagh, London; Lord Moonie, House of Lords; Alex Harries, Labour Party; Tracy O’Sullivan, Colchester; John Penney, Labour Party; Prof Steve Hall, Teeside University; Leon Russell-Hills, Electrician; Nick Harding, Labour Party; Mike Morris, Guildford; J Brian Harrison-Jennings, Former General Secretary, Association of Educational Psychologists; Dave Harris, Retired Lecturer; Mike Dunford, Labour Party; Peter Hurst, Liverpool; Dr Vanessa Pupavac, University of Nottingham; Alexander Birchall, London; Sue Heap, London; Prof Wolfgang Streeck, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne

Their website can be found here >>> A new development involving Professor Matthew Goodwin for consideration:

I thought the analysis of why the British Political Establishment is making such a mess of Brexit was extremely interesting and very perceptive.  

Just to remind you here is what has been said:-  “The real cause is that the entire political class lacks any compelling vision of Britain’s future, leaving most British citizens without effective political representation.
Having lost touch with ordinary people, political parties have retreated into European Union policymaking networks. After decades of integration, few politicians, civil servants or academic experts can now imagine any kind of future outside of the EU.”

This searing analysis does implicitly lay stress on the increasingly urgent need to get rid of the British Political Establishment who infest Parliament with their “Institutional Uselessness” and their corruption of its constitutional purpose to be the voice of the Nation. 

I feel I can do no better than to quote Oliver Cromwell:-  "You have been sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"


  1. I find Twitter to be a very useful tool for keeping abreast of political thought. A "tweet" that I found both amusing and insightful read something like this; "Remoaners were marching to demand the right to vote to continue to be ruled by people for whom we cannot vote"

  2. Perhaps what is most interesting about this Labour movment is that with about three or four exceptions, one being an ethnic German, the surnames of the signatories are all native to these islands. Perhaps we have here traditional rather than Marxist Corbynite Labour supporters. But then Corbyn was meant to be for getting out of the EU but Alistair Campbell says Labour should press for a second referendum. The election of a lady of Hispanic descent in New York and the ousting of the ten times elected Democrat and pro-Hillary candidate shows the split in the Democrats between those further to the Left and those pro-Hillary and prepared to get into bed with Wall Street and big corporations. It would seem that the same split is coming here. Indeed here it may be a split between the globalist international socialists and the traditional Labour nationalists. Perhaps they should realise that if they want to retain the loyalty of the ordinary working man then they have to ditch gloablism. As we have seen in Italy, a party of the "far right" and the left have joined forces to counter the globalist elites of the EU and other trans-national operations.

  3. The left-right coalition in Italy is one of the most interesting political developments of recent times. If replicated we could perhaps see an emergence of nationalist v internationalist as the principal political divide. The great majority of our current politicians, however, have based their career on supporting the globalist system.

  4. In Europe, there is ney such thing as left vs right anymore, its nationalist vs globalist. The BBC is globalist. It's likely smiling at what's happening in Sweden and Theediscland. It asks "What is Englishness?" whilst not asking the same of the cultures of other folk in the world. You might not be in gang but I think that if our homeland is selfstanding, London should become a selfstanding city-state. In their poll with YouGov, the towns of cultural Marxist instellings Oxford and Cambridge as well as London are the least English. English identity is felt by about 66% of folk in coastal and former workcraft towns but less than half of folk in the burgs Liverpool and Manchester (ethnic Irish burgs).

  5. A poll taken on Independence Day in America showed that only 47pc thought of themselves as extremely proud of being American compared with 70pc in 2005. Those intereviewed in New York largely blamed Trump but one black lady said that the country is now so divided. This was bound to happen as the Democrats overturned a bill in the 1970s to maintain the European nature of America in favour of all out multiculturalism and mass immigration - the population of America has trebled since the 1920s by the way. Whites are now in retreat and are begining to feel their backs against the wall. But don't be smug as that day is getting ever closer for most Westerm European countries. I remember reading a piece in the Daily Mail about five years ago entitled, " The end of white America" with the white minority arriving in the 2040s, already there with regard to children. The prediction would be that the Democrats would then hold power indefinitely as America drifted further and further to the Left. Hillary Clinton's deplorables put a stop to that for the moment.

    As I have said before, the countries on the up are those like China and Russia which are still largely homogeneous. For the future for Western Europe I think that Brazil or other former slave states in South America would be the paradigm.
    America will in the end be more like Central America. But in Brazil there is still a slight white majority and they hold the power. Diversity is not strength and anybody capable of an ounce of logic knows that.

    Angela Merkel's future is now on the line as the AFD grows in strength with the CSU sitting on their coat tales and threatening a split from the CDU. I recently saw a two minute clip of Marine Le Pen having a go at Merkel and former French president Hollande in the European Parliament; brilliant as she spoke for the people and not the elites as Europe faces a peasants' revolt. As for France, with insufficient police the country is descending into anarchy as it tries to cope with mass immigration and islamic terrorism.

    I recently spoke to a former teacher of mine and he told me that the town I grew up in now has the highest percentage of residents of Pakistani "heritage" in the country. He then said that down south is becoming so congested. I then asked if he was not a Liberal Democrat and he replised yes. But he seemed incapable of laying his complaints at the door of the party he supported who have always been the first to cry foul if anybody wanted to reduce immigration. So overcrowded is England now compared with the 30m optimum population it should have that we are witnessing the laboratory rat syndrome as people lose their courteousness and fight their corner against all-comers.