Total Visits

Thursday, 27 July 2017

Complaint made about Judge who claimed 'we are LUCKY to live in a multi-racial society'!

Complaint made about Judge who claimed 'we are LUCKY to live in a multi-racial society'! 

I read with dismay the reported remarks of District Judge Emma Arbuthnot in sentencing Viscount St Davids and I have therefore written the following complaint to the Lord Chancellor:- 
Lord Chancellor’s Department
Judicial Complaints
Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France 
London  SW1H 9AJ

Dear Sir

Re:  Complaint against District Judge Emma Arbuthnot
Politically biased sentencing remarks

I am making this complaint on behalf of the English Lobby which is a ‘not for profit company’ whose purpose is to stand up for English values and the English Nation.

We read with dismay the reported remarks of District Judge Emma Arbuthnot in sentencing Viscount St Davids.  We do not know anything other than what was reported in the newspapers, internet and broadcast media about the offences for which Viscount St Davids was convicted and sentenced, but it is a fundamental principle of English Justice that Judges are neither politically biased, nor give the appearance of being politically biased. 

Judging from the reported remarks this was not the case with this District Judge.  She used the opportunity to grandstand her personal political views before the national media in a case with considerable press interest because of person being sentenced was a member of the aristocracy.  In these circumstances the District Judge is quoted as having said:- “this multi-racial society we are lucky enough to live in.” 

This is not a statement of law, on the contrary this remark is blatantly politically loaded and partisan.  It is not a remark that everyone would agree with, but it is simply an expression of the current Establishment orthodoxy of liberal multi-culturalism.  Clearly she would have been well within her rights to both hold such an opinion and also to express it both as a private citizen and in most public offices.  This is not the position however for a Judge holding forth from the judicial bench in Court.

From her other remarks in the case one suspects that the District Judge was also in the minority on the issue of Brexit which seems to have been part of the matrix of the alleged offences. 

In short it is quite wrong for any Judge either in sentencing or in convicting in any court to give voice to their personal prejudices and political opinions however orthodox.  In this situation the District Judge has brought discredit to her office and should be disciplined.  If this is part of a pattern of behaviour by her, then perhaps she should be dismissed. 

Yours faithfully

R C W Tilbrook

Here is the English Lobby's press release:-

The English Lobby complaint made about the Judge who sentenced Viscount claiming we are LUCKY to live in a multi-racial society.

The English Lobby has written a letter of complaint to the Lord Chancellor to discipline District Judge Emma Arbuthnot for her blatant political bias and discriminatory prejudice in making the above remark.  Whilst this remark is fully in accordance with the increasing prevalence of Judges who are multi-culturalist liberals, it is nevertheless a blatant breach of an English judge’s constitutional and legal duty to be impartial and politically neutral. 

Robin Tilbrook, the Director of the English Lobby said:-  “Some people think like the District Judge that “this (is a) multi-racial society (which) we are LUCKY enough to live in”.”  Many others do not welcome it or accept it and others actively oppose it, so for the District Judge to use her opportunity of maximum publicity in a high profile case to make a blatantly political point was and is an abuse of her judicial position for which she should be disciplined. 

Let us see if the new Lord Chancellor, David Lidington MP, knows his duty and reins in this blatant display of political bias by a Judge. 

If you feel the same way about this please use the address above to put in your own complaint!


  1. Another disgraceful attempt by the Establishment to foist their own opinions on the population. I condemn this blatant use of position and fundamentally disagree with her opinion. Her opinion counts for nothing.

  2. No wonder why Muslims never get charged with inciting racially motivated hate crimes.

    This is precisely why racially motivated hate crimes perpetrated against the indigenous are never recognised and acted upon.


  3. What we have to realise is that the West is now living in a cultural Marxist dictatorship. Like communism, that other failed form of Marxism, it will brook no dissent and you could well consider what happened to Viscount St David's as a type of Stalinist show trial mark 2. This woman obviously hates her own race, history and culture as many of the rest of her "liberal" or rather illiberal elite and can't wait until they are confined to the history books. The probably is that she may be a judge but is a bit of an air head as well. I hope that European men will manage to survive the onslaught on their sperm because otherwise we don't stand a chance with those peddling a call for us to listen to our feminine side. Blacks in London on Tuesday had their annual march against slavery and colonialism and are demanding reparations from us and other former colonial powers. It is still all our fault as, because of the exploitation of Africa they cannot advance. Left to their own devices, of course, they would be another economic global superpower!? Europeans are guilty of all the world's sins and the global south has always been a haven of peace, civilisation, progress and stablitiy according to the Marxist credo. It emerged in the coverage of the march, that blacks and other non-Europeans in Dalston are complaining that their area is now being subject to white gentrification and they are being driven out. Interesting that they have been there for millenia and are now being ethnically cleansed from their traditional homelands in London. Funny, I thought that was what happened to the cockneys. But I must have just succombed again to white nationalist propaganda! The frightening thing is that you challenge this form of Marxist revisionist history at your peril and probably under pain of imprisonment. The good thing is that - as we discovered on Cross Talk on RT the other evening - "liberalism" is now being seen for what it is as is the "conservatism" that it replaced. This is why "conservative" Christian Russia is their nemesis. I sense that the counter-revolution will shortly be underway or rather I bloody well hope so.

  4. A Judge is supposed to be impartial, which she clearly is not when allowing her own opinion to sway her decision in 'awarding' sentence on Viscount St david's - he should appeal on the grounds that the Judge was 'biased'

  5. Replies
    1. Yes. We are LUCKY to live in a multi-racial society. So much better than living in racist bigot land!

    2. A sprinkling of different cultures is good, but mass immigration isn't - it's been an irreversible disaster in so many ways.

  6. Hello.This post was extremely fascinating, especially because I was browsing for thoughts on this topic last

  7. She is entitled to an opinion as are the rest of us but being a judge gives her no more influence than her cleaner has. Also she is safer in this country having an opinion than she might in other multicultural environments.