Total Visits

Tuesday, 30 August 2016

DOES CORBYN'S LABOUR HAVE ANY "MOMENTUM" IN ENGLAND?


DOES CORBYN'S LABOUR HAVE ANY "MOMENTUM" IN ENGLAND?


It seems highly probable that Jeremy Corbyn will be re-elected as Leader of Labour and then he and his “Momentum” group will set about the same task as Lenin applied himself to in reconfiguring the Russian Communists. 



Momentum want to turn the Labour Party into a hard-Left party in which the Bolsheviks squeeze out the Mensheviks. Whether the de-selected Menshevik Blairite MPs will thereafter go on to form a new party or join the Liberal Democrats we cannot be sure at present.


(Owen Smith is a leading light in the "Taffocracy" and someone who wants reruns of the EU referendum until the Demos gives in and votes Remain. Smith also wants England broken up into EU"Regions" and is an open enemy of the English Nation.)


So what does seem clear is that there really is no future in Labour for anyone who takes a pride in England or in being English.


Since those whom Labour has in recent times called the “white working class” are very likely to also call themselves “English” that will amount, in historical terms, to a decision by Labour to cease to be a serious contender for Government (at least through democratic means!).


Instead the “Momentum Labour” will no doubt seek to use their dominant position to infiltrate all aspects of our society, seeking to be the catalyst for socialist revolutionary change, however much such a change may be against the wishes of the majority of our country.


For my part I wish them nothing but ill in that endeavour, but by doing so Labour will have given up any serious attempt to lead the English, just has Labour has already lost any serious claim to lead the Scots!

11 comments:

  1. I remarked to a friend recently that some of Corbyn's policies, like the re-nationalisation of the railways and the prevention of the NHS being wholly privatised would appeal to many on the "far right". However, the problem is his international socialism. Time was when the Labour party was socialist but not international socialist, what I would term Marxist. Then they looked after the working class English and were hostile to immigration and the common market as was. But now they are part of the one world revolution, what Trump has called world socialism. But my friend said that this are not the real people behind the one world revolution. And as I have said before, international socialists like Corbyn are just the useful idiots who create the borderless, mongrelised world that the 62 people who own half the world's wealth have been working towards since the War, if not before.

    There was an interesting letter in our local paper about the Calais child refugees. The writer said that first of all we need to help the 75,000 children already in care here without having their welfare endangered. He then said that the word on the block was that these children have been sent ahead by their parents and as soon as we take them in their parents will miraculously re-appear demanding to be re-united here with their children. He then said that the population of Britain in 1945 was 48m - I though it was 50m - and that it is now 70m. We know it is more than 63m. As I saw you say on Russia Today, Robin, Western Europe cannot take any more and there are 60m refugees on the move to come. I wonder if anybody saw Simon Reeve on Lesbos the other evening watching the refugee boats arriving. He said that the answer should be to make sure that these people can stay put. But the likes of George Soros and Peter Sutherland do not want this. Their whole aim is to make their homelands uninhabitable so that they destroy Europe. The German army has 70 jihadists in its ranks but also 256 from the "far right". So these people are being trained for battle, the lines are being drawn. It is now probable that Merkel will be ousted as 50% of Germans want it to be replaced by her deputy Sigmar Gabriel; he who has put a stop to TTIP. But if Trump gets in - and the real polls show he is ahead - than TTIP and TPP will be dead in the water.

    Finally, Robin, I was interested to learn that, according to the increasingly demented Hillary Clinton, you and all those who have appeared for the EDs on RT are Russian agents; along with Nigel Farage and of course Donald Trump - as well as Ken Livingstone and Corbyn on the left!! Interestingly, Clinton has blamed Putin for the wave of aggressive nationalism that is threatening the one world dream. I watched a Russian paralympian saying that she has fought so hard to get to Rio but now has been banned. She said that she is proud of being Russian because Russians always fight. She is right, no country has lost so many in the defence of their homeland in centuries gone by. Sadly, the English were never allowed to even put up a fight for their soil. The single Marxist concept of "racism" has ensured that they will just hand it over.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is a pity that Hitler gave National Socialism such a bad name. It should just mean socialism in one country, the original meaning of Fascism, i.e., national solidarity (all in it together).
    Hitler and Mussolini's versions were imperialistic, i.e., globalist. Nation Socialism is the same thing as 'one nation Conservatism'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right but I have been sent a clip called the Rich Man's Trick. They chose Hitler to fight communism as he was a psychopath. It takes one to know one. They are all sociopaths and their aim is world hegemony for their own ends. Hitler started out right but was used as we all are for the sake of these bastards.

      Delete
  3. The candidates for Ukip leadership have made clear their hostility to the English parliament. Only an English nationalist party seeking English independence can support the introduction of the English parliament. The CEP (Campaign for an English Parliament) now accepts that fact.
    Ukip can only be anti-English.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Labour - the party of Migrants.

    And UKIP?

    http://www.betteroffout.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Brexit-February-2016_MEDIUM.pdf

    'If we get out of the EU, we will be in complete control over our own immigration system and can vet anyone wanting to come and live in Britain. We will be able to create a fairer and more equal immigration system. We won't pick someone from Germany or France over someone from China or Africa just because the latter "aren't European enough".'

    Imperialistic UKIP would favour creaming off the best of the crop from other countries, presumably to advance the interests of the UK rentier economy elite, while the rest of the country can go whistle in a deindustrialised wasteland - that global INTERDEPENDENCE again!

    No recognition anywhere of the paramountcy of English - or even British - interests. Just more One-Worldism.

    It's interesting that the late A.K. Chesterton, who in his younger days had written a piece with the title "Stand by the Empire", wrote in his last work "Facing The Abyss" (1976, pub. posth.) the following:

    "Secondly, and to some readers this may come as a shock, we must categorically reject, as another institution of the enemy, the internationalist agency once known as the British Commonwealth. . . the clamour of the Afro-Asian members made this nebulous conglomeration of peoples, united by no common allegiance, an active agent in the dissolution of the British world system. . . . What would take the place of a liquidated Commonwealth? Here again common interests suggest the answer. The countries once known as the British Dominions - the White Dominions - not only share a heritage which finds expression in
    innumerable departments of life but they require the cohesion of their world system for the proper exercise of their own national sovereignty.. . . "

    Has UKIP not been promoting the 'Commonwealth'?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Has Ukip not been promoting the 'Commonwealth'. It certainly has. And immigration from the new Commonwealth.

      Delete
    2. UKIP is a globalist party just like all the others which is why their immigration policy is a complete nonsensical farce and doesn't take into account the fact the majority of the British people believe there IS a difference between allowing half the Third World to settle here and having a load of white Australians, Canadians or New Zealanders do so. In some ways, even the Tories have a better immigration policy! Its high time, UKIP collapsed and left the political field to others who are more in tune with the British people. You could be that party but I'm afraid promoting English 'independence' especially now we are out of the EU won't do it. For one thing, separatism now would entail the creation of REAL, 'HARD' borders on this island.

      Delete
  5. Phillip Broughton the Ukip leadership candidate from the North East proposes doing away with the Barnett formula and getting fairness for England. Ukip can't do that because it is a unionist party. Broughton sounds like an English Democrat. It looks as though he's in the wrong party. That puts him in the same position as most of Ukip's supporters across the north.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the English Democrats had any sense they would be targeting the UKIP supporters across the North of England and the Midlands, as well as the Labour Party in those areas.

      The North of England and the Midlands are key to kindling English nationalism as a mainstream political movement.

      Delete
  6. The Germans are now afraid of travelling south to the sun and more and more are taking staycations on the Baltic and North Sea coasts rather than risk an attack by ISIL in Turkey, North Africa or even France and Spain. Tourism to Egypt's Sinai Peninsula must have totally ceased. But Germans also have to put up with the possibility of a terror attack at home as we all do. They are already stocking up with food and water in case of terrorist attacks/civil war.

    Meanwhile French schoolchildren have just returned to school and face draconian security measures and terror attack drills, even for the nursery schools where they are just being told to learn to sit still and keep silent.

    A poll has just revealed that two to one are in favour of a burka ban but the government will not even consider it. They are now as terrified of upsetting what even Farage has called the ghettoes in our midst as the rest of us are.

    European civilisation is now on the cusp of collapse as European countries are taken over by the global south. There will be no White Dominions are no white anything by the end of the century. Whites constitute about 8% if not less of the world's population and are falling rapidly vis a vis non-whites. A century ago they made up one third. They are now being pushed into the peripheries of their own countries and in time may be completely ousted. The Netherlands will have a Muslim majority in 15 years. The expression eternal vigilance springs to mind as our coasts are scoured for the refugee boats crossing the Channel. To protect your own borders was dismissed in the post war decades as being "racist" reminiscent of Die Wacht am Rhein. But the Germans perhaps had it right and the White Cliffs of Dover were our Rhein. If you want to know what the opposite extreme produces both in Europe and North America then look around you!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have been thinking again about Alex Jones talking of anti-white racism in the context of Peter Sutherland saying the UN must destroy the homogeneous nations of Europe. This is a thoroughly racist idea. But then I thought again about Gordon Brown speaking of sickeningly white Cumbria. Why can't anywhere be white any more? Sheer racism. Can you imagine what would have happened if he had said; "sickeningly Muslim Bradford, sickeningly Indian Hounslow or sickeningly black Brixton". So could he please explain what the difference is? As for his sidekick, the equally sociopathic Blair, he is still banging on about a second EU referendum. The sooner he is banged away for Iraq or, supposedly, some other chargeable offences at his own convenience the better.

    ReplyDelete