BRECON & RADNORSHIRE BY-ELECTION – COCK-UP OR STITCH-UP?
Last week on the 1st August there
was a Parliamentary by-election, the reports of which had been very
overshadowed by the national political events, like the formation of the new
Boris Johnson Premiership and Cabinet.
Then almost out of the blue, as it were, we learnt that the
Conservatives have lost the seat.
There were suggestions in the Remainer Main
Stream Media that Boris has already lost his bounce. A more obvious point on
the facts would be one that they are not so keen to report, given their
pro-Labour bias, that in fact the Labour candidate had almost lost his deposit
in a Welsh constituency which had once been part of Labour’s Welsh permanent
fiefdom! The seat was Labour for many
years until 1979.
A bit more enquiry reveals that the
Conservative Party’s candidate had previously been the MP, but the by-election
was called as a result of a Recall Petition because he had been convicted of
creating fraudulent invoices and claiming fraudulently on his parliamentary
expenses.
So what on earth induced the Conservative
Party to put him up again as a parliamentary candidate? Was it incredible arrogance? Incredible stupidity? Or some sort of devious
plot?
Of course in human affairs generally it is
often a mistake to discount the role of sheer mistaken stupidity. That maybe what has happened here; perhaps
coupled here with a sense of obstinate entitlement.
There is however an alternative idea to
consider.
Let’s first look at the timeline here:-
The previous MP and recent Conservative
candidate, Christopher Davies, pleaded guilty of putting in false expenses in
March 2019 and in April he was sentenced.
The Speaker launched the legal petition on the 24th April and
the petition was opened on the 9th May and remained open for
signatures until the 20th June.
It only needed to get 5,303 signatures but in fact got 10,005
signatures. 10,005 petitioners who
signed to remove him amounted to 19% of the 53,032 electors in Brecon and
Radnorshire.
Mr Davies was re-selected as the Conservative
candidate (the re-selection process now requires not only the local party to
support the candidate, but more importantly requires the National Nominating
Officer of the Conservative Party to sign the candidate’s Nomination
Certificate. The National Nominating
Officer of the Conservative Party is Victoria Carslake, who was of course an
appointment by Theresa May).
The close
of nominations in this by-election took place on 5th July and, as I
mentioned, the election took place last week on the 1st August.
This timeline alone shows that this
by-election can really have absolutely nothing to do with Boris Johnson. The fact that the recently convicted
fraudster Conservative candidate still managed to do so well might really show
that Boris Johnson, if he had any effect on it at all, very nearly got him
re-elected however unsuitable he might be as an MP!
So I return to the question of why would the
Conservatives put up a candidate who has not only been recently convicted of
fraud on his parliamentary expenses, but also to strong feeling locally about
this, triggered this by-election?
Another possibility, other than Conservative
stupidity, might be another devious plot by Theresa May and her inner
circle.
We now know that Theresa May never sought to
negotiate any form of proper Brexit. She
never suggested to the EU negotiators that we might leave with ‘No Deal’ and
she never attempted to get the United Kingdom a good deal. Her whole effort was to try and tie us up as
close to the European Union as possible, which is why she went on, not only
lying about what she was doing, but also signing us up to yet further EU
commitments, such as the new EU Army.
She also called her General Election not
because she wanted to guarantee Brexit, but rather because she wanted to be
independent of the Brexiteers and to impose her Agreement on the country.
So I suggest that a possible scenario is that
this totally unsuitable Conservative candidate was re-selected in order to lose
that seat and so give Remain supporters in the House of Commons yet more
clout.
All this was going on whilst Theresa May was
trying to and partly succeeding in getting huge further spending commitments
which would bind the hands of her successor, which was already most likely to
be Boris.
If this is what was actually happening, then
this by-election is nothing to do with Boris except in the sense that it was
always set up as a trap.
The most laughable suggestion is that this is
all the fault of the Brexit Party splitting the vote. This is of course a variant of the old line
of the most cynical Establishment vote manipulators that you cannot vote for
anybody else other than the Conservatives otherwise you get Labour (or vice or
versa if you are a former Labour supporter).
Whilst it is true that the Brexit Party got
more than the difference between the Conservative and Liberal Democrat, it does
not follow that people who voted Brexit Party would have voted for the Tory
convicted fraudster.
Of course all this undemocratic nonsense
relies upon the most appallingly undemocratic electoral system, the “First Past
the Post” which regularly cheats large numbers of voters out of their preferred
outcome.
Agreed..
ReplyDeleteBrexit Party & other patriotic parties splitting the vote seems to be an issue.
ReplyDeleteI have also always petitioned for proportional representation - the last petition however, only got 3.3K
The Jarvis vs Allen Email states that a fraudster could not be re-elected for 5 years if convicted in a Court, so surely, based on his information, Mr Davies re- election, detailed in this blogspot is illegal?
Contrary to what this blogpost says, Davies wasn't charged with fraud - which isn't a surprise, because he didn't benefit financially from what he did. He was charged with (and convicted of) forgery (of invoices). Presumably that does not incur the five-year ban to which you refer.
DeleteThe 5 Year Disqualification from Public Office is a Civil Penalty for Electoral offences
DeleteThat explains why Davies was able to stand.
DeleteRobin's conclusion is exactly what I thought at the time. It was set up to lose so that it would help Remainers to get a majority to stop a No-deal Brexit.
ReplyDeleteIf true, and I cannot find an argument that disproves it, then TM was the ultimate snake-in-the-grass. So much for her loyalty to the Conservatives! Newly shocking but why? Nothing should shock any longer. So much hope riding on you Robin!
ReplyDelete