2nd
Article 50 case
I set out below the letter which I have sent
starting the legal process to bring our second Article 50 case.
The aim of this case is to box in the UK
Government into a No Deal Brexit.
If the
required undertakings are given then they will have legal force!
If they are not given then we will know that Boris intends to stitch us all up in a version of Theresa May's terrible "Deal".
Mr
Jonathan Stowell
c/o
Government Legal Department
Team B6
One Kemble
Street
London
WC2B 4TS
Dear Sirs
Matter: In the matter of a further Judicial Review on the legal basis of Brexit
Letter Before Claim
This letter is drafted
under the judicial review protocol in section C of the White Book, which
provides for a response within 14 days.
1.
Respondent: Our clients identify two defendants: the Prime
Minister (or, if necessary, the First Lord of the Treasury), as the person with
overall responsibility for Brexit policy and the Secretary of State for Exiting
the European Union.
2.
Applicant: The English Democrats (Reg. No. 6132268) of Quires Green,
Willingale, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0QP, for and on behalf of the 15,188,406 voters
in England who voted to Leave the European Union in the June 23rd
2016 referendum.
3.
The details of the Applicant’s legal advisers, if
any, dealing with this claim:-
Tilbrook’s
Solicitors, of Quires Green, Willingale, Ongar, Essex, CM5 0QP
4. The
details of the matters being challenged:-
Any
further purported non-statutory Extensions or Revocation of the United
Kingdom’s notification to Leave the European Union given under Article 50 of
the Lisbon Treaty.
5. The
details of any Interested Parties:-
Every
person in England and in particular the 15,188,406 voters in England who voted
to Leave the European Union in the 2016 referendum.
6. The
Issues:-
Following the Judgments of the High Court, of
the Court of Appeal and of the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Miller
and another) – v – Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017]
UKSC5 and the consequent enactment of the European Union (Notification of
Withdrawal) Act 2017, there is no discretionary prerogative power vested in Her
Majesty’s Government to agree any extension to the Article 50 Notice, or to
Revoke the said Notice without a further express Act of Parliament to authorise
such Extension or Revocation.
Accordingly any further purported Extensions or
Revocation are also void and of no effect.
7. The details of the action that the Defendant is
required to take:-
What is sought from the Respondents is:
(i)
An undertaking that
there will be no further attempts to purport to vary the Notice given under the
said EU Notification of Withdrawal Act 2017 except pursuant to an express Act
of Parliament; and
(ii)
The formal admission
that the Government admits that any such purported extension of the notice
period or revocation would be legally invalid; and
(iii)
A formal admission that,
in the absence of any further statute, that the UK’s departure from the
European Union shall go ahead as currently notified on the 31st
October 2019.
8. ADR proposals:-
N/A
9. The details of any information sought:-
Not
applicable.
10.The details of any documents that are
considered relevant and necessary:-
Not
applicable.
11. The
address for reply and service of all documents:-
Tilbrook’s Solicitors of Quires Green, Willingale,
Ongar, Essex, CM5
0QP
12. Proposed reply date:-
14 days from the date hereof.
Yours
faithfully
Tilbrook’s
Robin, what date does the 14-day response period expire? Thank you for your persistence.
ReplyDelete14 days after deemed service which would probably
DeleteAllowing two days to arrive by post Friday the 13th sept
Would hope you achieve this as it is well justified and to the point Regards B.Peaurt
ReplyDeleteI thought it was 17.4 million people not 15.188,406
ReplyDelete15,188,406 in england. the rest across the rest of the uk.
DeleteRobin is quoting the number of people in *England* who voted to leave - the 17.4 million figure is the number of people who voted Leave in the whole of the UK..
DeleteThat's how many in England voted leave wales Scotland and northern Ireland add up to the difference
DeleteShould the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?
ReplyDeleteLocation United Kingdom (including Gibraltar)
Date 23 June 2016
Results
Votes %
Leave 17,410,742 51.89%
Remain 16,141,241 48.11%
Valid votes 33,551,983 99.92%
Invalid or blank votes 25,359 0.08%
Total votes 33,577,342 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 46,500,001 72.21%
It is 17. 4 Million plus.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your tenacity Robin. A true English Patriot.
ReplyDeleteCould a case be taken to the International Court of Justice? Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights people are entitled to have access to skilled judges. If the Blair government planted political activists into the judiciary, then the right to have skilled judges has been denied to the public. Then also the ECHR Article 6 says there is a right to a fair hearing and Article 9 indicates its an offence to have political judges. ECHR is not the European Union.
ReplyDelete