What the multi-culturalist British Establishment don’t want you to know about the Reading Jihadi attack
On the
evening of Saturday, 20th June shortly before 7.00 p.m. reports
started to come out that there had been a stabbing attack at the end of a
“Black Lives Matter” demonstration in Forbury Gardens in Reading, Berkshire -
in the heart of England.
Sure
enough the usual “Coulter’s Law” (“the longer it takes the news media to
identify a mass shooter (in the United States) the less likely it is to be a
white male”) applied to the reporting. We
were told nothing about the ethnicity, nor the religion of the attacker, nor
about what he was shouting as he cut the throats of his victims.
So far as
I could see all the Mainstream Media were initially claiming that there was no
“terror” motive. For the BBC at least
this denial continued until about midday on Sunday.
Curiously
in between we had had a flurry of calls by Leftists including the Leader and
the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, Angela Rayner, not to share any videos
or information about what had happened.
Whilst we
are used to the Left telling us that Islamist Jihadi attacks are now “part and
parcel of living in a modern city” (Sadiq Khan), what we are not so used to is
the Left trying to dampen down the story.
So it
looked as if there might be more to this story than usual.
One thing
that occurred to me that it might be that the Left were worried that this
attack might take the media focus of their neo-Maoists “Black Lives Matter”
Cultural Revolution and that they were trying to minimise the impact on that
campaign.
But the
sheer extent, of the effort to dampen down social media reporting of what had
happened, suggested that there might be a further motive. More of that later.
In the
meanwhile it came out that just as Coulter’s Law would have expected the
perpetrator was a young, male, Muslim, Libyan “refugee” with, so far as one
could tell, little education or skill that would be likely to be of any use in
the job market in a developed country, like England. He also has too much of a violent and
criminal history.
Here is what the Independent said about him:-
“Libyan
national Khairi Saadallah named as suspect
The suspect arrested over a terror attack that left three victims dead in Reading is a Libyan national called Khairi Saadallah, The Independent understands.
Saadallah, 25, was jailed last year for assaulting an emergency worker and has a lengthy criminal history, our home affairs correspondent Lizzie Dearden reports.
In court proceedings last August, over the assault of a judge who was sentencing him for previous offences, his address was given as Basingstoke Road in Reading.
That is the address of the suspect’s home, which was searched by heavily-armed counter terror officers on Saturday night.
Neighbours at the flat block in Whitley, just under two miles from the scene of the mass stabbing, believed he had been recently released from prison”.
The suspect arrested over a terror attack that left three victims dead in Reading is a Libyan national called Khairi Saadallah, The Independent understands.
Saadallah, 25, was jailed last year for assaulting an emergency worker and has a lengthy criminal history, our home affairs correspondent Lizzie Dearden reports.
In court proceedings last August, over the assault of a judge who was sentencing him for previous offences, his address was given as Basingstoke Road in Reading.
That is the address of the suspect’s home, which was searched by heavily-armed counter terror officers on Saturday night.
Neighbours at the flat block in Whitley, just under two miles from the scene of the mass stabbing, believed he had been recently released from prison”.
Evidently he has all too much Islamism in his world view too!
The
questions that arise for both Labour and for the Conservative British
Establishment parties is of course why they have been allowing unskilled,
illegal immigrants from war torn Muslim countries to come here, to live off our
benefits, and to be housed in our social housing, whilst our own
peoples' benefits and social housing opportunities are being cut? Also why wasn't such an undesirable violent offender not deported after serving his sentence for his first conviction?
Then of course we have had another display of the, now all too familiar,
selective, dishonest and biased reporting by the “Main Stream Media”.
In this
particular case we also have an explanation, in the identity of the victims,
for why Labour and the Left (and their enablers) became so unusually hysterical about trying to
close down reporting.
It turns
out that there had been a “Black Lives Matter” demonstration in that park which
had recently finished and that the group that were attacked had, not only been
in attendance at that demonstration, but were leading Leftists within Labour’s
multi-culturalist Rainbow Alliance, in this case for the LGBTQ+ falange.
Indeed
the first victim’s identity which was disclosed was that of a local politics teacher, Mr
James Furlong who had also been a local leading campaigner for 'Refugees Welcome'.
So it
seems as if a representative of Labour's refugee “community”, who is also a
member of their “Muslim Community” had been repeatedly plunging his knife into
leading representatives of the gay “community” who had been active within the
“Black Lives Matter” neo-Maoist group!
No wonder
when they are trying to smash our “Four Olds” (“Old customs, old
culture, old habits and old ideas”), that the Neo-Maoist’s should
be so alarmed over part of the Rainbow Alliance attacking another part and
of diverting attention away from them and on to a real problem of multi-culuralism!
Also I do
wonder what all the Establishment figures meant by saying that they will learn
lessons from this incident. Any
ideas? Any suggestions? (Even facetious
ones!).
