What the multi-culturalist British Establishment don’t want you to know about the Reading Jihadi attack

What the multi-culturalist British Establishment don’t want you to know about the Reading Jihadi attack

On the evening of Saturday, 20^th June shortly before 7.00 p.m. reports started to come out that there had been a stabbing attack at the end of a “Black Lives Matter” demonstration in Forbury Gardens in Reading, Berkshire - in the heart of England. 

Sure enough the usual “Coulter’s Law” (“the longer it takes the news media to identify a mass shooter (in the United States) the less likely it is to be a white male”) applied to the reporting.  We were told nothing about the ethnicity, nor the religion of the attacker, nor about what he was shouting as he cut the throats of his victims. 

So far as I could see all the Mainstream Media were initially claiming that there was no “terror” motive.  For the BBC at least this denial continued until about midday on Sunday. 

Curiously in between we had had a flurry of calls by Leftists including the Leader and the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, Angela Rayner, not to share any videos or information about what had happened.

Whilst we are used to the Left telling us that Islamist Jihadi attacks are now “part and parcel of living in a modern city” (Sadiq Khan), what we are not so used to is the Left trying to dampen down the story. 

So it looked as if there might be more to this story than usual. 

One thing that occurred to me that it might be that the Left were worried that this attack might take the media focus of their neo-Maoists “Black Lives Matter” Cultural Revolution and that they were trying to minimise the impact on that campaign. 

But the sheer extent, of the effort to dampen down social media reporting of what had happened, suggested that there might be a further motive.  More of that later.

In the meanwhile it came out that just as Coulter’s Law would have expected the perpetrator was a young, male, Muslim, Libyan “refugee” with, so far as one could tell, little education or skill that would be likely to be of any use in the job market in a developed country, like England.  He also has too much of a violent and criminal history.

Here is what the Independent said about him:- 

“Libyan national Khairi Saadallah named as suspect

The suspect arrested over a terror attack that left three victims dead in Reading is a Libyan national called Khairi Saadallah, The Independent understands.

Saadallah, 25, was jailed last year for assaulting an emergency worker and has a lengthy criminal history, our home affairs correspondent Lizzie Dearden reports.

In court proceedings last August, over the assault of a judge who was sentencing him for previous offences, his address was given as Basingstoke Road in Reading.

That is the address of the suspect’s home, which was searched by heavily-armed counter terror officers on Saturday night.

Neighbours at the flat block in Whitley, just under two miles from the scene of the mass stabbing, believed he had been recently released from prison”.

Evidently he has all too much Islamism in his world view too!

The questions that arise for both Labour and for the Conservative British Establishment parties is of course why they have been allowing unskilled, illegal immigrants from war torn Muslim countries to come here, to live off our benefits, and to be housed in our social housing, whilst our own peoples' benefits and social housing opportunities are being cut?  Also why wasn't such an undesirable violent offender not deported after serving his sentence for his first conviction?   

Then of course we have had another display of the, now all too familiar, selective, dishonest and biased reporting by the “Main Stream Media”.

In this particular case we also have an explanation, in the identity of the victims, for why Labour and the Left (and their enablers) became so unusually hysterical about trying to close down reporting. 

It turns out that there had been a “Black Lives Matter” demonstration in that park which had recently finished and that the group that were attacked had, not only been in attendance at that demonstration, but were leading Leftists within Labour’s multi-culturalist Rainbow Alliance, in this case for the LGBTQ+ falange. 

Indeed the first victim’s identity which was disclosed was that of a local politics teacher, Mr James Furlong who had also been a local leading campaigner for 'Refugees Welcome'. 

So it seems as if a representative of Labour's refugee “community”, who is also a member of their “Muslim Community” had been repeatedly plunging his knife into leading representatives of the gay “community” who had been active within the “Black Lives Matter” neo-Maoist group! 

No wonder when they are trying to smash our “Four Olds” (“Old customs, old culture, old habits and old ideas”), that the Neo-Maoist’s should be so alarmed over part of the Rainbow Alliance attacking another part and of diverting attention away from them and on to a real problem of multi-culuralism!

Also I do wonder what all the Establishment figures meant by saying that they will learn lessons from this incident.  Any ideas?  Any suggestions? (Even facetious ones!).

Ex Wakefield Tory councillor named in dossier revealing Islamophobic comments

On Monday the Yorkshire Post and all its affiliates published the following article:-

Ex Wakefield Tory councillor named in dossier revealing Islamophobic comments made and shared by party members

A former Wakefield councillor has been named and shamed in a dossier revealing Islamophobic comments by current and former Conservative Party members.

By David Spereall

Bryan Denson, who led the opposition Tory group on Wakefield Council between 2007 and 2009, was one of more than 20 individuals called out by the campaign group Hope Not Hate in an article published on Monday.

According to the group, Mr Denson shared a Facebook post by the Kent branch of the English Democrats in 2015, suggesting David Cameron was wrong to call Islam "a religion of peace".

The post featured images of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and Lee Rigby, the soldier who was murdered in Woolwich by a pair of extremists in 2013.

Mr Denson served as a councillor during the 2000s, and as the Conservative group leader between 2007 and 2009.

The BBC was told on Monday afternoon that the Conservative Party had suspended those named in the dossier who were party members.

The Local Democracy Reporting Service has tried to contact Mr Denson for comment, but he is yet to respond.

However, it's been suggested he left the Tory Party for UKIP after standing down as a councillor for the Wakefield Rural ward in 2011.

Current Conservative group leader, Nadeem Ahmed, condemned Mr Denson's actions.

The Hope Not Hate dossier was published on Monday. It attacked the Conservative Party for failing to take strong action on members who'd been found to share Islamophobic material.

He said: "Bryan should have known better.

"I've not spoken to him for a long time so I don't know who he's been hanging round with to influence his thinking in that way.

"I think there's people of a certain profile who are quite new to social media and who don't realise that everything they say is out there straight away.

"People may have certain views that they've hidden for a long time and then they think they can express it on social media."

Councillor Ahmed said the issue showed some people willingly conflate freedom of speech with racist and bigoted views.

He added: "I think there's an element of people in society who think, "Why can't we say that stuff?"

"I've had conversations with people who think like that.

"I don't want to ban freedom of speech, but expressing racist and sexist views isn't freedom of speech."

Others named and shamed in the dossier included a mixture of Tory activists and councillors from across the country.

In a tweet accompanying its findings, Hope Not Hate said: "The Conservative Party needs to take much more seriously its obligation to Muslim members, and to the wider community.

"That means tougher sanctions, and more transparency about its processes and decisions.

"Time and again, Conservative activists have been suspended for Islamophobia. Time and again they have been allowed back without apology or serious disciplinary action. The lack of transparency means we rarely see what has been decided, or why."

In response a Tory spokesman told the BBC: "All those found to be party members have been suspended immediately, pending investigation.

"The swift action we take on not just anti-Muslim discrimination, but discrimination of any kind is testament to the seriousness with which we take such issues."

Here is a link to the original>>> https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/ex-wakefield-tory-councillor-named-dossier-revealing-islamophobic-comments-made-and-shared-party-members-2017364

I have responded with a letter to the Editor of which I have no confidence will be printed by that self-glorifying advocate of “free speech”.  I will report if the Yorkshire Post does publish it.  Here is my letter:-

Dear Sir

Re:  Your article on Monday, 2^nd March by David Spereall:-  “Ex-Wakefield Tory Councillor named in dossier revealing Islamophobic comments made and shared by Party members”

The above article “named and shamed” Bryan Denson who was “called out” by the Far-Left “Campaign Group” Hope not Hate, for sharing a Facebook post by the Kent Branch of the English Democrats in 2015 which suggested that “David Cameron was wrong to call Islam “a religion of peace””. 

Yet again, despite the disingenuous claims made by the Yorkshire Post’s Editor in his BBC Radio 4 interview your newspaper is shown to be against the free speech of all those who do not agree with your Editor’s Leftist views. 

For anyone to describe Islam as “a religion of peace” is to demonstrate either that they are lying, or that they are ignorant of the history of Islam.  Anyone who does know anything at all about Islam’s history will be aware that it is a religion that was not spread by “Peace”, but by the sword and thereafter maintained by terror and massacre. 

To claim otherwise is not an exercise in free speech, but in deception and propaganda, which is what any Newspaper or Editor who actually cared for free speech should be keen to “call out”.  So I say ‘well done’ to Mr Bryan Denson for exercising his free speech and ‘badly done’ to the Yorkshire Post for opposing free speech.

Yours faithfully

R C W Tilbrook

Attacks by a Jihadi “now part and parcel” of living in a modern city

On Sunday, 2^nd February, we had another one of those attacks by a Jihadi which Sadiq Khan once described as “now part and parcel” of living in a modern city!

This one was an attack by Sudesh Amman, who had only just been released from prison for terrorist offences and was apparently a fulfilment of one of his “life goals” to die in Jihad. 

It is always worth commenting that contrary to the mainstream media narrative Jihadis cannot be reasoned with.  They are sincere and devote fundamentalist Muslims, who believe in the literal words of the Koran. 

They are following in traditions that date back all the way to the Prophet Mohammad himself and the idea of dying in Holy War as a ticket immediately to paradise with all your sins wiped.  This idea is a key part of the reason why Islam was so successfully spread by Jihad (Holy War) across much of the Eurasian land mass after the death of the Prophet. 

The informative Press Association article which appeared on the internet is reproduced below. 

This attack comes only a few weeks after the attack on London Bridge on the 29^th November, again by a convicted Islamist but on that occasion he started by killing two of his Cambridge Graduate social workers who had him flagged as a poster boy for their rehabilitation scheme.

How wrong they were!

Here is the article:-

“Streatham terror attacker Sudesh Amman’s ‘life goal’ was to die a martyr

Streatham attacker Sudesh Amman had been fascinated with carrying out a terror attack using a knife, the Old Bailey heard when he was sentenced a little over a year ago.

Then aged 18, he had smiled and waved at the public gallery as he was jailed for three years and four months.

Amman is believed to have been back on the streets for just a few weeks before the stabbing attack – fulfilling one of his so-called life goals of dying a martyr.

The supporter of so-called Islamic State (IS) had pleaded guilty to possessing and distributing terrorist documents and was sentenced in December 2018.

His stash of manuals on bomb-making, knife-fighting and close combat included the titles Bloody Brazilian Knife Fighting and How To Make A Bomb In Your Kitchen.

Police found a notepad in the North West London College student's home, in which the phrase "life goals" had been scrawled.

"Top of the list, above family activities, was dying a martyr and going to 'Jannah' – the afterlife," Alexis Boon, then head of the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command, said after he was jailed.

He said Amman had a "fierce interest in violence and martyrdom" and that he was fascinated with dying "in the name of terrorism", and added that the case was "a reminder of the need to be vigilant to signs of radicalisation and report it".

Amman, who had then lived with his family in Harrow, north-west London, posted al Qaida propaganda on a family WhatsApp group, exposing siblings as young as 11 to graphic material, and had shared bomb-making literature via Skype chat.

He had told his girlfriend of his wish to carry out acid attacks and that he preferred the idea of a knife attack over using bombs.

Prosecutor Kelly Brocklehurst said police were alerted by a Dutch blogger who identified extremist material in a Telegram chat in April 2018.

There was a photo of a knife and two firearms on a Shahada flag bearing Arabic words which mean "armed and ready".

An air gun, a black flag and a combat knife were seized from his home when he was arrested in May that year.

Mr Brocklehurst said: "The defendant had discussed with his family, friends and girlfriend his strong and often extreme views on jihad, the kuffar, and his desire to carry out a terrorist attack.

"Much of his fascination with conducting an attack was focused on using a knife but reference was also made to committing acid attacks on mopeds."

The prosecutor said Amman's interest in Islamic extremism and IS in particular was "more than a mere immature fascination with the taboo and with graphic violence".

He added: "He is clearly someone with sincerely held and concerning ideological beliefs."

Amman had entered guilty pleas to six charges of possession and seven of disseminating terrorism documents.

He denied three charges, which were ordered to lie on court file.

The science and maths student had previous convictions for possession of an offensive weapon and cannabis.

He was aged just 17 when he began collecting terrorist material in 2017.

Judge Mark Lucraft QC said Amman had a "very concerning series of offences".