Nick Lowles, eminence gris of Hope Not Hate (aka Labour's dirty tricks department) and an alleged associate of far Left terrorists and now the spreader of HATE (not hope!), is at it again!
The skulking keyboard warrior Nick Lowles in his desperation to save his job has turned into the everything he states he hates. He has become a advocate of hatred!
Let me explain. We all know that the BNP are thankfully finished. The English Democrats have cause to thank Hope not Hate for their part in helping us accomplish this. Civic English nationalism will always been thankful for the demise in the British National Party (BNP) as we all want to see a moderate and integrated society in England. However with success comes change and the problem for Nick Lowles' Hope not Hate group is where do they go now their target is nearly killed off? Unfortunately it now looks as if Nick Lowles is desperately casting his 'you are hateful' net to include anyone who opposes the careerists of the Labour Party in his attempts to keep Hope not Hate employees in work or to facilitate nice Labour Party jobs once the BNP finally closes it doors.
Now he's bracketing reasonable and moderate English nationalists (the English Democrats) and British nationalists like UKIP, with the BNP and the EDL.
I know - 'first hand' that UKIP uses unethical and dirty tricks when attacking opponents, especially ones they fear. (The South Yorkshire Police Commissioner election result showed that they are right to fear the English Democrats because we trounced them despite having only a tiny fraction of the resources that they used). I also know that UKIP is a British nationalist party that pretends to be favour of an English Parliament, whilst not formally adopting it, just as the BNP did, to gain votes. But to label both UKIP and the English Democrats as racists and fascists alongside the BNP and the EDL is so ludicrous that Nick Lowles is showing why it has been alleged that he was friendly with the Far Left terrorists who bombed Harrods in 1993 in his past.
To watch Hope not Hate morph into Hate not Hope is very sad as it becomes ever more obvious that their association with the Labour Party and their Trade Union paymasters has perverted their message. Why? Because democracy and the right to express different opinions is essential for English society if it wants to be inclusive. It gives us all hope.
To call anyone without due cause and who disagrees with you a fascist and a racist is hateful.
Yet what will his Unite and Unison Labourite paymasters say about Nick Lowles’ behaviour? Will they say: Nick you have been a very naughty boy and you must go to Coventry, not Rotherham, and not play with those nasty big UKIP boys again? No they won't, as Labour face a serious challenge in Rotherham and are weakened by internal arguments in the local branch.
Now its hard not to say I told you so to Cliff Dixon , Stuart Parr, Jamie Mcaffery, Gareth Young and the rest of UKIP's "black ops team" who thought that snuggling up to Nick Lowles would give UKIP an advantage over the English Democrats.
But they appear to have forgotten Nick Lowles’ Far Left antecedents. So I must commiserate with them now that their reward is to had UKIP bracketed with the BNP and the EDL.
Silly boys! didn't do your homework before playing with fire, did you? You have been used by this Labour Party stooge and in the process have damaged the campaign for a democratic voice for the English nation. Mind you, UKIP are British nationalists and not interested in English concerns so perhaps they won’t be sorry!
Here is the article >>> http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/2335/bnp-humiliated-in-manchester-polls
Basically Lowles is a fanatic who will never be
ReplyDeletecontent.He will just keep branding other parties,be they ED,Tory even Lib dem,as hate parties until he has destroyed all opposition.Then he will turn on anyone within his own party who disagrees with him.Essentially he is a paranoid Stalinist type personality.
It might be better just to leave the HnH business alone now. The vast majority of people have never heard of HnH, and I suspect that HnH are quite glad that so much space is being devoted to rubbishing them. Let's concentrate on the things that matter - a decent balance between private and public in the economy; the democratic deficit that England suffers from both in terms of the UK, and in terms of the EU; higher standards in public life; regaining control of our borders; an end to the inexplicable war in Afghanistan; a better England.
ReplyDeleteNow we have UKIP members being branded as "racist" (the universal smear-word) and being deprived of their foster-children in Rotherham. Ironically, the children have been removed because they are not "indigenous, white, British" which strikes me as a racist pretext. Punishing someone for their politics would have been the norm in East Germany, or the Soviet Union, but this is present-day England. It illustrates how far down our country has been dragged by the "politically correct".
ReplyDeleteClive,
Weston-super-Mare.
Indeed it does. UKIP has attempted to meet the globalist PC fanatics half-way and be 'respectable' but where has it got them? These people can't be appeased. To put it bluntly, these nutters want to see the total genocide of the English and the other nations of the United Kingdom.
DeleteHow can anyone be a civic English nationalist? The English are an ethnicity ie an ethnic nation therefore blacks and asians CAN'T be English. I am sorry to have to be so impolite about this but those are the facts and it seems as if many ethnics also realise this as many of them are loath to describe themselves as English but are content to call themselves British.
ReplyDeleteThe BNP for all its faults which were many (I used to be a BNP supporter) recognised this and so did Enoch Powell which is why he was so hated by the political Establishment.
We all have a right to our identities. What we are arguing for is that the English are allowed theirs and that at the very least, those who choose to live here subscribe to the idea of England and its culture as the parent. Secondly those who wish, naturally, to express their own cultures do not think that they can impose them on us to become the new parent culture, or demand dispensation from the law that they might express that culture or religion to its full extent. If you live in England live by its law and respect its people and traditions.
DeleteAlternatively you have the humann right to leave.
@Anonymous 24 November 2012 14:17 What about children of people that emigrated here and their children who were born here? Do you not feel they have a right to regard themselves as English? Would you send them off to somewhere they have never known?
ReplyDeleteIndia is we are told a booming economy so I fail to understand why those born in India or of Indian descent do not want to go and be part of it and improve the lot of their fellow Indians rather than staying in Europe which is rapidly drifting into bankruptcy. As it is Indians continue to rely on aid sent by European Christians to stop some of their fellow Indians from starving, even if those who let this happen are themselves millionaires or even billionaires - whilst Indians attack Christians in the Sub-continent.
DeleteThe same thing puzzles me about those of African or West Indian descent. It seems they have no desire to go and help the continent of Africa whilst banging on about their African blood. It seems that only Europeans seem to want to go and improve the lot of the third world.
This is one thing I remember Enoch Powell saying in 1968 i.e. that those who have come here and received an education should go back and help to improve the lot of those in their countries of origin.
I suspect, however, that this was not part of the one world plan, which was to replace Europeans with third worlders. They have conived to ensure that immigrants are kept here for sufficient generations to ensure we can never ask them to return home.
They have a right to regard themselves as English but that doesn't mean that I or others have to accept them as such. The fact is that to be English is to be of the English ethnic group ie a PEOPLE of common descent and culture. If they are regarded as English then what am I? I am sorry to have to be so un-PC and blunt about this but ethnic groups ie nations are exclusive things. If they are not then they have no meaning.
DeleteThe Indian caste system categorises people, period. A friend of mine who runs a Christian chatity to help the destitute chldren of south India explained to me that they [Indians] see the poor as a fixture, if you will, and refuse to help them. That is why the 'Christian' west helps and why the aid is a gross waste of money.
DeleteEuropean leaders, having taken fright after two world wars caused by the ultra-nationalist Germany which came into being after German unification in 1870 (Germany was not much of a problem hitherto, unlike France), culminating in Hitler's assertion of racial superiority of the blond and blue-eyed ( strange since many Austrians like him are not blond and there are an awful lot who are not blue-eyed, was he?) saw the future in a borderless Europe and civic nationalism.
ReplyDeleteCivic nationalism, however, together with the suppression of Christianity, have been the hallmarks of all left-wing Utopian movements, from the French Revolution, Russian Revolution and today's culturally Marxist EU; i.e. there is a movement called Europe for all. In fact the Soviet bloc, whilst espousing civic nationalism, had a problem handling anybody who wasn't racially European.
Civic nationalism, coming from the French Revolution influenced, of course, the founding fathers of the United States, who, however, still treated their black slaves as just that. It has influenced present-day France as well.
However, there had to come a point where civic nationalism would eventually completely alter the racial identity of ethnically European nations if it insisted on them being the melting pot for the whole world. This, coupled with the use of imported cheap labour at the expense of the more expensive native variety, has now brought the United States and France to an ethnic tipping point. In fact, there was a law brought forward by congress in 1968 in the US to preserve the European identity of America but this was overturned by the Left.
This Enoch Powell tried to point out. But coming too soon after the Second World War his fellow poiticians took fright at being tarred with Hitler's brush, took fright and kicked the whole issue of what was going to happen as a result of mass non-european immigration decades hence into the long grass. Powell just wanted this discussed openly. They effectively kicked the ball out of Powell's hands to where they thought it was safely hidden during their lifetimes.
But it will not go away. Civic nationalism, as opposed to ethnically-centred nationalism must inevitably lead to the total erosion of national identity be it in Europe, North America, India, China or Japan - one of the aims of the Marxist revolution.
Can Norway, Sweden and Holland ever be the same if they are muslim and not ethnically North European? Can England be the same if it is Afro-asian? Will America and France be the same if they are majority non-white? The answer is clearly no. So what do Europeans want, their countries to be European as they have been since the dawn of history, or not? This is the question that Europeans have to ask themselves and probably are but dare not say so openly. The problem is that, since Powell, there is nobody in a position of authority to ask the question for them without being deemed to be totally politically incorrect and racist in today's culturally Marxist Europe. If nothing else they run the risk of being up in court on a charge of making a "hate speech".
Enough of this navel gazing. WIN IN ROTHERHAM
ReplyDeleteAND IN MIDDLESBROUGH
DeleteMiddlesbrough should be a 'shoe-in' for the English Democrats
Delete